WarSclerotic

bama welcomes Iran sanctions.

WASHINGTON – The Obama administration welcomed Congressional approval of sweeping Iran sanctions Friday, after months of reservations and negotiations over the legislation.

The Associated Press: US: Turkey must demonstrate commitment to West.

WASHINGTON — The United States is warning Turkey that it is alienating U.S. supporters and needs to demonstrate its commitment to partnership with the West.

The remarks by Philip Gordon, the Obama administration’s top diplomat on European affairs, were a rare admonishment of a crucial NATO ally.

“We think Turkey remains committed to NATO, Europe and the United States, but that needs to be demonstrated,” Gordon told The Associated Press in an interview this week. “There are people asking questions about it in a way that is new, and that in itself is a bad thing that makes it harder for the United States to support some of the things that Turkey would like to see us support.”

Gordon cited Turkey’s vote against a U.S.-backed United Nations Security Council resolution on new sanctions against Iran and noted Turkish rhetoric after Israel’s deadly assault on a Gaza-bound flotilla last month. The Security Council vote came shortly after Turkey and Brazil, to Washington’s annoyance, had brokered a nuclear fuel-swap deal with Iran as an effort to delay or avoid new sanctions.

Some U.S. lawmakers who have supported Turkey warned of consequences for Ankara since the Security Council vote and the flotilla raid that left eight Turks and one Turkish-American dead. The lawmakers accused Turkey of supporting a flotilla that aimed to undermine Israel’s blockade of Gaza and of cozying up to Iran.

The raid has led to chilling of ties between Turkey and Israel, countries that have long maintained a strategic alliance in the Middle East.

Turkey’s ambassador to the United States, Namik Tan, expressed surprise at Gordon’s comments. He said Turkey’s commitment to NATO remains strong and should not be questioned.

“I think this is unfair,” he said.

Tan said Turkish officials have explained repeatedly to U.S. counterparts that voting against the proposed sanctions was the only credible decision after the Turkish-brokered deal with Iran. Turkey has opposed sanctions as ineffective and damaging to its interests with an important neighbor. It has said that it hopes to maintain channels with Tehran to continue looking for a solution to the standoff over Iran’s alleged nuclear arms ambitions.

“We couldn’t have voted otherwise,” Tan said. “We put our own credibility behind this thing.”

Tan said that Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan was expected to discuss these issues with President Barack Obama on the margins of a summit of world economic powers in Toronto on Saturday.

Gordon said Turkey’s explanations of the U.N. episode have not been widely understood in Washington.

Senators urge Obama to prevent one-sided resolutions against Israel from passing.

Boarding of the Mavi Marmara brought violence to Israeli soldiers forced to fight back in defense.

Creative Commons Attribution-Generic license.

If you like this …

Israel cannot be blamed for its defense; Hamas cannot help but celebrate the violence they provoked

View all »

• “The United States has traditionally stood with Israel because it is in our national security interest and must continue to do so. Israel is our strongest ally in the Middle East and a vibrant democracy. ….it is our national interest to support Israel at a moment when Israel faces multiple threats from Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the current regime in Iran.”

Those sentences are part of a letter submitted to President Obama from 87 Senators, including the two from Washington State, which urged President Obama to oppose a U.N. resolution criticizing Israel’s handling of a flotilla.

The Senators express that Israel was acting in self defense when its troops boarded ships in the flotilla and that Israel, often singled out for criticism by the United Nations, has a right to defend itself.

• “[V]ideo footage shows that the Israeli commandos who arrived on the sixth ship, which was owned by the Turkish Humanitarian Relief Foundation (the IHH), were brutally attacked with iron rods, knives, and broken glass. They were forced to respond to that attack and we regret the loss of life that resulted.”

The letter goes on to question any connection between Turkey and Hamas and requests an examination in order to find an answer. The IHH is a member of a group, Union of Good, which was designated as a terrorist organization and strongly supports Hamas.

A similar letter with 307 (out of 435) signatures has been circulated in the House.

April 7, 2010:  About 60 retired United States Generals and Admirals wrote a letter urging Obama to recognize that Israel’s success is intertwined with America’s because of shared values and threats to our well-being. “The dissemination of hatred and support of terrorism by violent extremists in the name of Islam, whether state or non-state actors, must be addressed as a threat to global peace. In the Middle East, a volatile region so vital to U.S. interests, it would be foolish to disengage – or denigrate – an ally such as Israel.”

Israel is America’s Most Loyal Ally!
as shown through past records in both the U.S. State Department and United Nations:

Israel’s voting record:
1999 Israel voted WITH America 90% of the time!
2000 Israel voted WITH America 96.2% of the time!
2001 Israel voted WITH America 100% of the time!
2002 Israel voted WITH America 92.6% of the time!
2003 Israel voted WITH America 89% of the time!

Voting record of other allies, 2003:
Great Britain voted with America 60% of the time.
Australia voted with America 56% of the time.
France voted with America 54% of the time.
Canada voted with America 49% of the time.
Japan voted with America 42% of the time.

Gulf Daily News » Local News » ISRAEL ‘PLOTS TEHRAN RAID’.

Halutz on Iran: Israel will know what to do if threatened – Israel News, Ynetnews.

During interview with Alhurra TV network, former IDF chief of staff says, ‘I don’t advise anyone to test Israel’s abilities’; notes Second Lebanon War now appears as great success

Ynet

Iranian aid flotilla cancelled, won’t sail to Gaza – Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News.

Organizers cite ‘Israeli threats’ as the reason for canceling the flotilla; separate Iranian ship heads to Gaza via Caspian Sea.

One of the organizers of an Iranian aid flotilla that was to said to Gaza in efforts to break Israel’s naval blockade on the territory, announced Thursday that the event has been cancelled due to “Israeli threats.”

	Iranian ship heading for Gaza from Bandar-Abbas.

Army Radio reported that a separate Iranian ship, carrying 60 Iranian activists, was being prepared to sail to Gaza via the Caspian Sea. This after the Lebanese media reported several days ago that Egypt has denied Israel’s request to prevent Iranian ships from passing through the Suez Canal toward Egypt.

Meanwhile Thursday, the U.S. State Department issued a statement calling the aid flotillas to Gaza irresponsible.

“Mechanisms exist for the transfer of humanitarian assistance to Gaza by member states and groups that want to do so,” the U.S. State Department said regarding Lebanese plans to ship aid to Gaza. “Direct delivery by sea is neither appropriate nor responsible, and certainly not effective, under the circumstances.”

The Lebanese and Iranian efforts come after a tragic incident aboard a Turkish aid ship, part of an 8-ship Turkish flotilla, which was headed for Gaza on May 31. Israeli navy commandos, intent on preventing the ship from reaching Gaza’s shore, boarded the ship, and were met by a violent mob wielding sticks and knives. The clash that ensued resulted in the deaths of nine Turkish activists.

DEBKA.

President Barack Obama may not be happy about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu‘s new Syrian initiative when it is presented to him on July 6, but he will find it hard to reject.
First, he concedes more Golan land than offered by any former Israeli leader and, second, his initiative draws heavily on a plan which, according to DEBKA-Net-Weekly‘s US sources, is dubbed in Washington “the improved Fred Hof initiative” – named for the senior aide to the US Middle East envoy George Mitchell and Obama’s own contact-man with top Syrian officials.
Frederic C. Hof has developed broad personal ties with top Syrian political, military and intelligence ranks. He has come to believe that in time, Syria can be prevailed upon to break away from its close bonds with Iran and Hizballah and that President Bashar Assad‘s requirements for peace can be squared with Israel’s legitimate needs.
The US president holds Hof’s views in very high regard and often heeds his suggestions on how to proceed on Middle East issues.
Netanyahu is therefore certain he is backing a winning horse in the White House and Damascus by adhering closely to Hof’s roadmap for peace with Syria. His challenges on the domestic front are more daunting.
The Golan Heights’s elongated structure, as described in the first two articles, means that there is very little space between Israel’s front line against Syria and the interior.
No more than one to five kilometers separate Israeli Golan villages and its main water sources – the Sea of Galilee and Yarmouk River which are fed from Lebanese springs – from Israel’s border defenses – the Hill Line.
(See full-size map http://www.debka.com/static/images/Golan_Lines.swf)
Shifting the Hill Line even marginally to the west would substantially weaken Israel’s defense capabilities and make it more difficult to mount a successful attack on Syria.
In 1976, the late Yitzhak Rabin became the first Israeli prime minister to inform Washington (Secretary of State Warren Christopher) of his government’s willingness to execute a withdrawal from Golan. Since then, Israeli military strategists have charted two lines of military withdrawal to the west in the event of an interim peace accord being negotiated between Syria and Israel, which Netanyahu intends proposing on July 6.

The Hill Line

Located 3-5 five kilometers west of the present armistice line dividing the Golan between Israel and Syria, the Hill Line starts in the north at Jabal Qata (south of Majdal Shams) and continues southward towards Tel Shiban, Mt. Shifon, Tel Fazra and Givat Bezek. This line does not have much political logic. Syria would gain a very small sliver of land, probably not enough to form the basis of any accord. Its sole advantage would be the transfer to Syrian sovereignty of three of four Druze villages, whose inhabitants never gave up their Syrian citizenship and retained close family and trade ties on the other side of the border.

The Ridge Line

This is the focus of the proposal Netanyahu is carrying to the White House. Between two and five kilometers from the Jordan River, the Ridge Line is the last high-altitude area before the land on the western face of Golan drops steeply down to the Jordan River, the Hula Valley and Sea of Galilee.
An Israeli pullback to the Ridge Line is tantamount to ceding the entire Golan to Syria and dismantling all the settlements established there in 43 years – hugely expensive and political dynamite at home.
Retaining this line is nevertheless a better deal for Israel than a full withdrawal beyond the Jordan River, because of two advantages:
A. Israel would retain control of both banks of the Jordan, a major source of its water supply. A troop presence on the two banks would make it easier to redeploy military strength to the Golan in the event of war.
B. Holding the high Ridge Line would give the Huleh Valley and Sea of Galilee basin military protection against enemy fire (a regular feature of the 1958-1967 years) and place an obstacle in the path of Syrian forces advancing on these lowland areas of northern Israel.

Netanyahu prefers the Syrian track to the Palestinian

The Israeli prime minister will try and convince the US president that the Syrian track is more promising than the badly limping Palestinian talks by showing him how much land he is prepared to give up to Syria, DEBKA-Net-Weekly‘s sources note. The Ridge Line offers a much more generous Israeli withdrawal than the Hill Line and therefore is closer to Assad’s maximalist demand for Israel to pull back to a line west of the Jordan, hand over every inch of the Golan and give Syria access to the Sea of Galilee, for good measure.
Netanyahu’s proposal moreover runs parallel to Fred Hof’s improved roadmap (which started life as an idyllic plan for the Golan to be transformed into a nature reserve shared by both countries).
The Hof plan is a roadmap in that it provides for Israel to withdraw to the Ridge Line in two provisional stages:
In Stage One, Israeli troops would pull back from the Hill Line to the central Golan heartland, but retain its cluster of early warning stations and surveillance posts on Mt. Hermon – so as to keep track of the ground from Golan up to Damascus, 40 kilometers away.
Israel would also continue to hold the southern sector of Golan and the moderate gradient sloping from the northeast to the southwest. The southernmost section is a sheer drop down to the Jordan River to the west and the Yarmouk River to the south. Its rocky cliff face cannot be traversed by armored units, as explained above.

The second stage only after the first has held for some years

Stage Two would take place after a specified number of years, when Israel is certain that Syria has abandoned its belligerent intentions and is ready to sign a full peace treaty. Until then, Israel will continue to hold this southern gradient, the east bank of the Jordan River and its early warning and surveillance facilities on Mt. Hermon.
According to our sources, an element of the Hof plan which the Israeli prime minister has not accepted is its inclusion of “small tracts in the Jordan River Valley” for placing on the negotiating table with the Golan. Otherwise, he is prepared to buy the improved Hof roadmap for peace with Syria and fit Israeli policies into its frame.
Any move to quit Golan would be extremely unpopular in Israel. It would require an 80-member majority (of the 120 members of Knesset) to revoke the law passed in 1981 extending Israeli jurisdiction to the territory.
To achieve this Netanyahu would have to reshuffle his cabinet, dropping right-wing factions in favor of left-of-center partners.

DEBKA.

Pantsyr-S1E

In the past two years, Israel has extended its military edge over Syria in many fields. The danger of an incursion by Syrian armored divisions, a very real menace for the 30 years from 1973-2003, has been sharply reduced. This has been achieved by the Hill Line deployment on the Golan – which bristles now with highly sophisticated anti-tank weapons – and the vast improvement since the Second Lebanon War of 2006 of Israel’s aerial and ground resources for knocking out armored combat vehicles including tanks.
Much enhanced too are Israel’s air and naval superiority, whereas the Syrian Air Force’s technical and operational fitness has declined.
To make up for these shortcomings, the Assad regime is investing heavily in updating its air defenses – always a strong point of the Syrian military alignment, even though it never kept pace with the Israeli Air force’s improved responses. Damascus has taken up the Russian offer to speed up deliveries of the latest versions of its anti-aircraft Pantsir-S1 systems, which were only assigned to the Russian army as recently as May of this year.
Each of the vehicles which carry a 90-kg (198 pound) Pantsir-S1 has radar with a 30-kilometer range, two 30mm cannons and 12 Tunguska missiles. The Russian-made missiles have a twenty kilometer flat range and up to 8,400 meters (26,000 feet) against flying targets.

Sharing with Hizballah expands Syrian might and reach

DEBKA-Net-Weekly‘s military sources note that Syria deployed these very missiles in late 2007 when Israeli warplanes bombed its plutonium reactor near the northern town of Dar az-Zwar, after commandos seized the North Korean nuclear materials it contained.
Believing their clandestine nuclear facility was well protected, the Syrians were stunned to discover that their Pantsir-S1 radar instruments had missed tracking the incoming Israeli jets. They were forced to conclude that Israel’s electronic warfare systems are capable of disabling Syria’s air defenses and have since set about clipping Israel’s edge in three areas:
Six commando divisions (the seventh division is still being put together) have been established and trained for “close combat.” They are made up of mobile infantry units transported by helicopter, rather than armored combat vehicles, and armed with the most up-to-the-minute weaponry and gear, including huge quantities of sophisticated anti-tank missiles and night-vision devices.
The Lebanese Hizballah, using only some of these resources (supplied by the Syrian army), were able to hold Israeli tanks back from breaching the central sector of southern Lebanon and the Beqaa Valley during the 2006 war.
Syria has gone all out for surface-to-surface missiles. It has acquired in addition to ballistic missiles which can hit any point in Israel from almost anywhere in Syria, a large collection of missiles and rockets with shorter ranges – from dozens of kilometers up to approximately 200.
Tens of thousands of these weapons have been transferred to Hizballah in Lebanon, so incorporating the Shiite militia’s armory into the Syrian missile array.
(See DEBKA-Net-Weekly 447 of May 28: An Unheard-of Number of 800 Scud Missiles Ready to Fire).
Damascus has built up a formidable arsenal of deadly chemical weapons which can be launched by missiles, chemical artillery shells or air force planes.

In a war, Israeli tanks have five days to reach Damascus

By these measures, Syria has substantially ratcheted up its military might.
In the last three years, furthermore, Syria has added Hizballah’s military resources to its own. This process of integration was boosted still further five months ago by the military pact signed in Damascus by President Bashar Assad, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hizballah leader Hassan Nasrallah.
Israel rearranged its Golan forces opposite Syria and units facing Hizballah across the Lebanese border in accordance with the new reality, taking into account that an outbreak of hostilities with Syria would automatically bring its ally Hizballah – and possibly Iran too – into the conflict.
The priorities set by the Israel Defense Forces commanders in any conflict are, first, to defeat Syria before going for Hizballah. From this point of view, Israel’s line of defense on the Golan is a perfect fit because it can be manned by a small number of troops, requires little air cover and can easily be switched over to offensive battle array. The improved Hill Line would leave the Israeli Air Force free to attain command of the skies and bombard Syrian and Hizballah missiles.
Israel’s military planners regard the attainment of air superiority at the onset of combat to be the prerequisite for subsequent effectiveness – both in dealing with Syrian surface-to-surface missile forces and for targeting Syrian infrastructure. Their war mission would be the rapid destruction of Syria’s entire sea, land and air forces for the ultimate objective of bringing Israeli troops and tanks to the gates of Damascus in short order, no more than five days from the start of combat.
Israeli armed forces’ confrontations with Syria and Hizballah would focus on disallowing Syria to use its chemical weapons and blocking Syrian or Hizballah troop incursions into Israel, thereby frustrating their cherished dream of ending a war with the acquisition of chunks of Israeli territory.
(See DEBKA-Net-Weekly 430 of January 22, 2010: Iran-Hizballah Mark out Patches of Northern Israel for Capture).

DEBKA.

In the last issue of DEBKA-Net-Weekly (No. 449 of June 18), we reported exclusively that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was preparing to present President Barak Obama with a new peace initiative for Syria when they meet at the White House, after his aides convinced him that this was the most pressing issue on the US president’s mind.
Those talks have since been scheduled for July 6 and the initiative has been fleshed out as a proposal mapping out the sections of the disputed basalt plateau of Golan Israel is prepared to cede to Syria and under what conditions.
(The attached full-size map http://www.debka.com/static/images/Golan_Lines.swf sketches the situation today and the projected withdrawal lines)

According to the plan developed by Netanyahu, Israel and its army, the IDF will withdraw to the so-called Ridge Line (see attached map) – provided Syrian President Bashar Assad follows the example of the late Anwar Sadat, president of Egypt from1971-1981, who paid a state visit to Jerusalem in November 1977 and offered Israel full peace and his country’s adherence to the Western bloc. Under the peace accord he signed with Israel in 1979, Egypt recovered the entire Sinai Peninsula from Israel and accepted its demilitarization.
To regain Golan, which Syria lost after attacking Israel in 1967, Assad would additionally be required to sever his political and military bonds with Iran and withdraw his political and military support from the terrorist organizations, Hizballah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the fringe groups based in Damascus.
Politically, partial Israeli withdrawal to the Ridge Line would restore to Syria the 1,200 square kilometers of Golan land held by Israel and dismantle nearly all of the Israeli communities established there in 43 years with their 20,000 Jewish dwellers. Tactically, it would leave the Israeli army well placed to swiftly recapture the Golan in any exigency.

The high rocky plateau is a major strategic asset

DEBKA-Net-Weekly‘s researchers and staff have prepared a wide-ranging analysis of the disproportionately large geopolitical importance of this small rocky plateau and the strategic options available to Israel and Syria – with accompanying maps as illustrations.
Since 1967, Israel has controlled 1,200 square kilometers of the Golan’s 1,800 kilometers, with only a brief interruption. In 1974, an armistice agreement restored the Golan town of Quneitra to Syria and installed a UN Observer Force – UNDOF between the two armies.
The tiny enclave is enclosed by the Mount Hermon ridge in the north (part of which is in Israeli hands), the Jordan River and Sea of Galilee in the west and the Rakkad and Yarmouk Rivers to the south. Northeast of the Hermon is a chain of inactive volcanic cones whose past eruptions have endowed the territory with its fertile volcanic soil.
Shaped like an elongated egg, the Golan is 62 kilometers long from north to south. At its narrowest point in the north – between Majd al Shams and the Jordan River – it is just 12 kilometers across; its central bulge is 26 kilometers broad, narrowing again toward the south.
The Hermon peak, controlled by Syria, is roughly 2.800 meters high. The highest slope in Israel’s hands, called the “Snow Observatory,” rises to approximately 2,300 meters and houses an early warning station.
From there, the high tableland drops down to the southwest. The northern and central mountains, where most of Israel’s defense lines and army positions are located, are roughly 1,000-1,200 meters high, forming a gradient that dips down and levels out 250 meters above sea level over the Sea of Galilee, dropping sharply from there down to the Jordan River in the West and the Yarmouk River in the south.

The Hill Line is a natural tank barrier

Part of this gradient is composed of the rocky cliffs of The Ridge Line, a formidable barrier to passage in and out of the Golan.
The eastern face of the Golan opposite Syria forms a watershed beginning in the Hermon and descending southward along a nearly continuous ridge-line up to Tel Fares in the central Golan. This second barrier is known to the military as The Hill Line, control of which offers tactical advantages.
From one side, it offers a clear vista of the forty kilometers up to the western outskirts of Damascus; from the other, it commands the soft center of Israeli-held Golan, where most of the Jewish communities are located outside Syria’s line of vision and high trajectory fire.
This Hill Line is a natural barrier against tanks. Any Syrian armored forces trying to recapture the Golan would have to circle around on lower ground under the guns perched overhead.
Between 1948 and 1967, the Golan towered over the Huleh Valley and Sea of Galilee and was a source of Syrian military harassment. Its annexation on December 14, 1981 was seen as vital to securing northern Israel – although this act never won international recognition.
The Israeli prime minister is preparing now to move on and revise that assessment.

DEBKA.

George Papandreou

While Western and Turkish media outlets harped in the last two weeks on Israel’s loss of its only Muslim ally in the Middle East, Jerusalem was busy acquiring a new strategic partner – Greece, another NATO member with plenty of Middle East interests, who was perfectly willing to step into Turkey’s shoes and invest in stronger military and intelligence ties.
DEBKA-Net-Weekly‘s sources in Athens and Jerusalem report that this development was not so much planned in Jerusalem as it was initiated by Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou, who boasts many Jewish and Israeli friends and business contacts, some of whom hold high political and intelligence positions in Israel. He saw a chance for Athens to slot into Ankara’s place in Jerusalem and transform their present diplomatic, economic, military and intelligence ties into a thriving strategic alliance, as advantageous to both sides as were Israel’s former relations with Turkey.
According to some sources, Papandreou expects this alliance to extricate Greece from its financial woes, aside from looking to Israel’s help for speeding up the upgrade of his armed forces and helping transform them into the Christian mainstay of NATO in the Balkans and southern Europe – in place of the Muslim Turkish army.
This notion was not the outcome of Israel’s break with Turkey or the clash aboard the Turkish Mavi Marmara on May 31 between Israeli commandos and pro-Palestinian Turkish activists. It has been evolving for some time, first broached in the summer of 2008 when Papandreou allowed 100 Israeli F-15 and F-16 fighter-bombers to pass through Greek Mediterranean air space for practicing long flights and in-flight fueling.
The distance between Israel and Greece there and back is 1,900 kilometers, identical to the distance between Israel and Iran.

A strategic partner made welcome in Athens

The Greek prime minister went out of his way to be of assistance, making available to the Israeli Air Force the crews and advanced S-300 PMU1interceptor missile batteries Athens purchased from Russia back in 2000. They were allowed to practice bombing sorties against these batteries, in case Moscow decided to sell them to Iran and Syria.
The severe financial crisis besetting Greece this year enhanced the friendly ties between Athens and Jerusalem. While European Union countries spent long months discussing whether to bale Greece out and save it from collapse (eventually granting a €110 billion package), Papandreou turned to Jewish financial titans in Europe and the United States for help to keep the Greek economy afloat.
The new strategic alliance has produced immediate benefits for Israel.
DEBKA-Net-Weekly‘s intelligence sources report the Greek prime minister took upon himself to keep key Mediterranean ports out of bounds to ships en route to confrontations with Israel’s Navy over its blockade of Hamas-ruled Gaza. He made personal appeals to the prime ministers of Lebanon, Cyprus and Malta to prevent those vessels docking and taking on supplies and fuel or departing for Gaza from their ports.
He also worked behind the scenes in Brussels to sell EU leaders on the step negotiated between Quartet envoy former British prime minister Tony Blair and Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu for opening the Gaza crossings to civilian goods while keeping the sea blockade in place.
Papandreou’s influence was crucial in obtaining the EU’s tacit acceptance of the deal.
It was also instrumental in persuading Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri who, with his Saudi sponsors has extensive investments in the Greek shipping industry, to confidentially ask Cypriot and Maltese leaders to close their ports to the Gaza-bound vessels.

Turkish generals alarmed by military benefits Israel can confer on Greece

Papandreou’s intercession in the flotilla crisis left Turkish and Iranian ports as the only remaining departure points for Gaza-bound vessels and held up preparations for the next ships to set sail.
But Turkish Prime Minister Recep Erdogan is reluctant for Turkey to stand out as the only country bent on a showdown with Israel and is thinking twice about following up the first flotilla. Even Hizballah is hesitating.
He is already facing angry criticism from large sections of Turkey’s financial, diplomatic, military and intelligence communities over his anti-Israeli stance and total alignment with Tehran and Damascus. And Turkish generals are alarmed by the nascent strategic ties between Jerusalem and Athens, warning their prime minister that the Greek armed forces will benefit from the upgrade of its weapons, standards of combat and technological capabilities and soon outstrip Turkey and be hard to handle.
Erdogan was also alerted by his military and intelligence chiefs to the harm Israeli-Greek intelligence cooperation could wreak to Turkish interests and plans in the Mediterranean, Black Sea and Caucasian regions.
These warnings have given the Turkish prime minister pause, DEBKA-Net-Weekly‘s sources in Ankara report. He has suspended some of his overt moves against Israel, but not so far given up on his anti-Israel policies.
For now, he is looking for a way to get around the evolving Greek-Israeli partnership. Our Jerusalem sources, for their part, report this partnership looks set to prosper and generate a spate of joint activities, most of them discreet.