WarSclerotic

One Comment on “Gingrich Calls For Declaration Of Worldwide War On Islamic Terror – America’s Newsroom”

1. Tyrannovar Says:

   
   December 12, 2015 at 3:48 PM

   Newt Gingrich is Sooo clueless. Has that guy even READ the Koran?
   And the same goes for Raheel Raza.

   And every time Obama uses the word “ISIL” he’s making a mortal threat to Israel. Obama is gratuitously including Israel within the province of the Islamic State when the Islamic State, IS, is not even in Israel. But by using the term ISIL (the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) Obama is granting IS some recognition of a legitimate claim to Israeli territory.

   Terrorism is not the problem.
   Islam intends to conquer the world, that’s the problem.
   And terror is only one of the weapons Islam uses to conquer the world.
   Islam can still make all its enemies submit to Islam by the use of other weapons, even if it doesn’t use terrorism at all.
   What other weapons?
   Besides terror (the car bomb or the dirty bomb) Islam also has the Islamic population bomb, the Islamic demographic weapon.
   There are those in the West who are totally opposed to pressure cooker bombs, and yet, those are the same people who think it is the height of love and charity and generosity and altruism to welcome into Western countries Muslims in their millions, Muslims who fully intend to outbreed and replace and eventually dominate their Western hosts ( and that’s hosts, as in host/parasite).

   It’s not the “radical” Muslim terrorist who uses a “pressure cooker bomb” who is the problem.
   The problem is the “moderate” little Muslima who fully intends to use the overwhelming power of the Islamic population bomb to transform her new host country into the newest province in the worldwide Islamic Caliphate.

   Gingrich says that “Islamic supremacism” is the problem. Islam is founded upon supremacism. Without “Supremacism” Islam would not be Islam. It is Islam that is the problem.

   King Abdulla of Jordan is playing “good cop, bad cop”, he says stand with moderate Islam against radical Islam, when what he really means is pay all your attention to the radical Islamic straw man we’ve stood up to distract you while we sneak in by the back door and flood all your countries with our “moderate Muslims” until Islam is made victorious over the whole world.

   Is Gingrich talking about “terrorism” or “supremacism”? Because those are two, very different things.

   Islam may not even intend to be victorious by terror. Terror might be the throw away radical option that Islam uses to get its enemies to compromise and to accept the less bad, but still mortal, moderate option of accepting a tidal wave of moderate Muslim refugee immigration and the resulting Muslim demographic explosion until their enemies simply have to submit to Islam by force of numbers.

   And Raheel Raza, By the Numbers, what a load of crap. She’s either clueless as well, or she’s playing the same “good cop, bad cop” game as the King of Jordan.

   The fact is that people become Muslim by reciting the Shahada, or by birth or some other simple innocuous way. Most new Muslims are totally clueless about the details of the commitment they’ve made by becoming Muslim, but they are committed to every command of Islam none the less, the radical Muslims will see to it, and eventually, failure to carry out the commands of Islam can be punished with death. Muslims like Raheel Raza may think they are in the outer ring of Islam, moderate, Western oriented Muslims, but Islam is a slippery slope and eventually even she will be forced to slide down the slope toward the inner rings of Islam, toward a true understanding of Islam as it is written in the Koran.

   Reply