The Right’s victory over the leftist media

Source: The Right’s victory over the leftist media –

In Jerusalem, I saw many people, women and men, religious and secular, young and old, rejoice at the Likud election victory party. Attendees understood that the Blue and White party was an invention of the media, which had 3-D printed the slogan “Anyone but Bibi” to oust Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.”

At the Likud victory party in Jerusalem this week, I saw many people, women and men, religious and secular, young and old, rejoice. The revelers’ cheers were mainly an expression of the Right-wing’s victory over the leftist media. Attendees had internalized that the Blue and White party list was an invention of the media, which had 3-D printed the slogan “Anyone but Bibi” to oust Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.”

Channel 12 reporters Guy Peleg and Amnon Abramovitch have continued the election campaign as if it was not democratically decided by Israel’s citizens. The election failure creates new energies, which produce familiar headlines from days past.

Former Supreme Court President Aharon Barak has written more than once that the court has no sword or purse, but it does have the public’s trust. There is sometimes a sense of a dispute over the definition of the word “public.” The Israeli Left has already proved numerous times that in its opinion, the public, which it sees as a herd of ignorant, troublemaking, reckless fools, is of no importance to modern liberalism. It is only the “progressive and enlightened public” that is deserving of attention and appreciation. In the eyes of the judicial elite, the public is the “legal community,” which includes judges, lawyers, academics and commentators that serve as the link between the court and the masses.

In recent days, we received an instructive lesson on how the collaboration between the judicial elites and those under their command in the media operates. As soon as the possibility Likud party member Yariv Levin would be appointed justice minister was raised, Peleg railed against the move, claiming he could not fathom Netanyahu would give him the portfolio with the knowledge “his affairs are expected to be heard in court.” A sharp message that warned it would not be wise to appoint a contrarian minister unwilling to align itself with the judicial system’s takeover of the activities of government authorities. Levin’s possible appointment was immediately and crudely compared to former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s appointment of Professor Daniel Friedman to the role of justice minister.

I did not laugh when Abramovitch joked that the significance of Levin’s appointment would be another year in prison for Netanyahu. This was the darling of the judicial elite issuing an explicit threat at Netanyahu. Now the only thing missing from this story is for them to try to frame Levin. We’ve seen this before. The judicial elite knows how to frame appointees and thwart appointments of those they do not hold dear. Former Supreme Court Vice President Elyakim Rubinstein joined the “gevalt” campaign against the appropriate and important trend of decentralizing government power among the authorities, as is accepted in enlightened states.

The power accumulated by the Supreme Court and its representatives in government authorities fractures the foundations of democracy. Justices are supposed to resolve conflicts and protect the minority from the oppression of the majority. Israel is one of the only democratic countries in the world in which a majority needs protecting from the usurpation of the minority, which under the auspices of the court, tries to lead society without having been elected to do so.

The issue of the judicial system’s growing power is also given intense expression in the fundamental constitutional issue of the immunity of public officials. In 2005, following the double votes in the Knesset, the law that grants Knesset members immunity was amended with remarkable speed. The amendment allows the attorney general to file an indictment against a member of Knesset directly with the court, without the need to first remove the immunity, at their own discretion. This genuinely harms and significantly distorts the immunity of lawmakers, immunity that is essential to their ability to carry out their mission.

The significance of the amendment is that lawmakers do not have immunity unless they ask to activate it while also detailing the reasons they require the immunity. In a majority of enlightened democracies, including France, England, Canada, the Scandinavian states and many others, it is law enforcement that must convince parliament to remove immunity, and not the other way around. The issue of lawmaker immunity should be re-examined, in particular at a time when the balance between the government authorities in the country must be restored. Leaders were elected to lead, attorney generals to serve as legal advisers and judges to judge.

The Passover holiday is an expression of freedom out of unity. May we be able to eliminate the bitterness and together, out of fraternity and friendship, exhaust all of the good and beauty that exists in our lives in the Land of Israel. A very happy holiday indeed.


Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

One Comment on “The Right’s victory over the leftist media”

  1. Sarge Says:

    The American Reform Movement was, and is, particularly acerbic in the criticism of Bibi, Betar, Zionism, Likud… A handful pretends to speak for all Diaspora Jews. They do not. What that segment of the Diaspora is really saying is: “I have always depended upon the kindness of strangers.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s