Trump’s Rubicon moment in Iraq: Praising America’s ‘warriors,’ ending war

Source: Trump’s Rubicon moment in Iraq: Praising America’s ‘warriors,’ ending war – Middle East – Jerusalem Post

Trump described the US withdrawal as deliberate, casting cold water on criticism that it was spur of the moment.

BY SETH J. FRANTZMAN
 DECEMBER 27, 2018 13:36
U.S. and Turkish soldiers conduct the first-ever combined joint patrol outside Manbij, Syria, Novemb

“We like to win, we are going to win,” US President Donald Trump told the troops at Al-Asad airbase in central Iraq. It was his first visit to US forces abroad and comes in the wake of Trump’s decision to withdraw from Syria. It also comes in the wake of the resignation of US Secretary of Defense James Mattis, who was popular with the troops and also the resignation of anti-ISIS envoy Brett McGurk.

Trump’s decision to go to Iraq the day after Christmas is part of an attempt to change the narrative after being slammed for his reversal of Syrian policy and accusations that he made the decision without consulting the Pentagon or State Department. By speaking at Al-Asad in western Iraq he sought to reach out directly to the American military. This was an important and symbolic speech because it comes at a crux of his foreign policymaking and also mid-way into his administration.

“You’re modern day warriors,” Trump said, praising the troops. Reading from a prepared speech, he sought to emphasize some points, going off the prepared text from time to time.  He listed the various units at Al-Asad, including the 201st Regional Support Group, the 1st Expeditionary Rescue group and the 3rd Cavalry regiment, as well as the special operations group stationed in Iraq. Trump sought to highlight the achievements of the four year war on ISIS, including what he said was the liberation of 20,000 square miles of territory and 3 million civilians. “Because of these gains the service members in Syria can come home,” he said. Trump noted the US initially getting involved in Syria for “three to four months,” which appeared to be a reference to the US supporting the Syrian rebels against Bashar al-Assad’s regime in 2011. For Trump it was one long war that should be ended. “I gave our generals six more months in Syria [in 2016], and that was a year and a half ago, they said they need six more months and another six more months, and another, and I said no.” He said US troops needed “clear objectives,” and that after reducing ISIS-controlled areas by 99%, other countries in the region could do the rest.

Trump described the US withdrawal as deliberate, casting cold water on criticism that it was spur of the moment. He also said the US would stay in Iraq to prevent an ISIS resurgence and to keep an eye on Iran. His emphasis was on America no longer doing all the fighting and funding of conflicts without getting reimbursed. “We aren’t the suckers of the world.” To rounds of applause he said that the US was fighting in areas it shouldn’t be fighting and spending billions on 19 years of war, a reference to the long war since 9/11. “We want to fight where it is meaningful,” he said, noting that anyone who attacked America would suffer consequences like no one has suffered before.

Trump appeared at ease and relaxed with the soldiers. After the speech he also took selfies with them. This is a Rubicon moment for the US President. He sought to use the speech to show that he is in touch with average American demands and to challenge Democrats, who he referenced several times, to build a stronger border wall and also to fund the military better. This is a rare politicization of a speech in front of the troops and it will be noticed back home. He is trying to position himself for the new year when a Democrat-controlled House of Representatives will challenge Trump’s policies. He also wants to shore up supporters and cast doubt on the challenges he has faced from Senators who balk at his Syria policy. Senator Lindsey Graham has been a harsh critic of leaving Syria and abandoning US partners on the ground who helped fight ISIS. He also warned Trump not to follow up with withdrawing from Iraq. “We also must not abandon our Kurdish allies who have fought so hard by our side in Syria.” Trump, however, did not mention those allies, instead saying Turkey would deal with ISIS and the US would be working closely with Turkey. Turkey has vowed an offensive against US Kurdish partners in Syria, setting up a strange scenario in which the US leaves and watches one ally fight another.

The Trump doctrine here is that the US must come first and that these foreign problems are not America’s problem. For instance, Trump was criticized in Iraq for not meeting officials in the government. Iraqi leaders didn’t even seem to know Trump was planning a visit, although Trump’s team reportedly reached out to Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi’s office, the Iraqi leader didn’t want to come to Al-Asad air base and the personal meeting was cancelled. It’s not entirely clear when Trump planned the visit, whether he decided to go after the decision to leave Syria on December 19, or before. National Security Advisor John Bolton, who was one of the few advisors he confided the Syria policy change to before making it, came with him.

Now Iraqi politicians are slamming the visit, especially the pro-Iranian groups. Qais Khazali, a one-time detainee of the Americans who formed a Shi’ite militia and then became a political leader as well, said that Iraq’s parliament should vote to remove US forces from the country. This is no surprising as many of the pro-Iranian parties and groups have opposed the US presence in Iraq, only asking for help against Islamic State, but not wanting a real American involvement. With the exception of the Kurdish autonomous region, much of Iraq is hostile in one way or another to the US presence, either due to historic reasons such as lingering support for Saddam Hussein, or because of US-Iran tensions or perceived US abuses during the 2003-2011 US role in Iraq. In the Kurdish region there were hopes for a Trump visit, even as there is criticism of the US walking away from Kurdish areas in Syria.

Trump’s visit wasn’t about Iraq or the Middle East. It was primarily about Trump and US forces. In this sense it feels like a Rubicon moment because that is when the Roman leader Caesar decided to cross into Italy with his army to oppose the meddling politicians in Rome. Trump wants to leverage his Iraq visit to tone down criticism at home, and show that while he may not make friends in major media, he has the support of average Americans. This has been his narrative from the beginning, seeking to challenge the status quo and also to question US commitments abroad and whether the US is paying too much and doing too much for foreign countries. In the region the visit will be judged as Trump sticking by his Syria decision and seeking to reduce the US footprint. This will encourage Russia, Turkey and Iran to continue to pursue their agendas in Syria and perhaps to leverage anger in Iraq over Trump’s visit to pressure the US in Baghdad as well. With McGurk gone a key US official who worked on Iraqi coalition politics and smoothing relations between Baghdad and Saudi Arabia, is no longer working on the Iraq file. Trump’s team may now find that leaving Syria causes another domino to teeter.

 

Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s