Brett Decker: ‘Trump in One Year Is Already Better Than 16 Years’ of Bush, Obama ‘Put Together’

Brett Decker: ‘Trump in One Year Is Already Better Than 16 Years’ of Bush, Obama ‘Put Together’, BreitbartRobert Kraychik, January 6, 2018

MANDEL NGAN, Win McNamee, Jim Lo Scalzo-Pool/Getty Images by ROBERT KRAYCHIK6 Jan 201813

“Trump in one year is already better than sixteen years of [George W. Bush and Barack Obama] put together,” said former Wall Street Journal editor Brett M. Decker, pointing to a current 17-year high in consumer confidence.

Decker, an expert on Asia and the bestselling author of Bowing to Beijing: How Barack Obama Is Hastening America’s Decline and Ushering a Century of Chinese Domination, joined Friday’s edition of SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight with Breitbart News’s Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon and Senior Editor-at-Large Rebecca Mansour.

“The leading indicator, when you dig into the data on why consumer confidence is high, is because people are anticipating higher wages,” said Decker. “The economy and consumer, they work logically. … What you’re seeing [are] the consequences of positive policy.”

President Donald Trump’s economic policies incentivize economic investment in America, said Decker, noting the mobility of capital in the modern era. “Businesses and consumers are [responding] logically” to the Trump administration’s economic policies, he added.

Decker rejected narratives crediting former President Barack Obama’s economic policies with recently developing economic figures during Trump’s presidential tenure, framing such assertions as “absolutely crazy”: “You look at the unemployment numbers, and it’s 4.1 percent. I look at Obama and Bush kind of combined, when I look at their block of sixteen years. Anyone that says this is inheriting some kind of Obama economy, he had eight years, and in 2010, the unemployment rate was 9.6 percent, absolutely crazy. … This idea that it has anything to do with Obama is absolutely crazy.”

Dropping unemployment rates, said Decker, will not be welcomed by all persons or interests. “Big business” interests, he said, prefer higher rates of unemployment given their depressive effects on wages. He also praised Trump’s emphasis on expanding domestic manufacturing. “When there are fewer people looking for jobs, you have to pay those few people more to take those jobs. What scares me about this is big business … seeing the unemployment numbers go down, and they’re like, ‘Oh, no. We’re going to have to pay these people more. We better call Paul Ryan and get him to flood us with cheap immigrant labor.’ So not everybody who looks at these numbers gets excited. There are different kinds of reactions.”

Decker went on to say that “one of [his] favorite things that Trump has done [was when] he was with some of the automakers, and he pointed to the head of Toyota of America, he said, ‘You have to build plants here.’ Within a short period of time, Toyota canceled a factory they were building in Mexico and said they were going to put it in the U.S., instead. What is that, a few thousand extra manufacturing jobs?”

Decker added, “Trade policy, I think, is one of the clearest areas where, if you look at the deindustrialization of America, how much government policy matters. The period between 1994, when NAFTA was passed, and 2014, a 20-year period … our trade deficit with [Canada and Mexico] went up 430 percent. … We get zero benefit out of these trade deals.”

America’s hemorrhaging of manufacturing jobs to other countries, said Decker, was economically disadvantageous: “Fundamentally, I think most people know in their heart of hearts, you can’t just be a consumer economy. If you want to consume anything, you have to make something. We’ve had decades of policy where we just decided we didn’t have to make anything anymore.”

Neo-conservative predictions of China’s political liberalization resulting from its deeper integration into the global economy had not borne out, said Bannon and Decker, with the former describing it as “one of biggest strategic mistakes” of modern Western political leadership.

Decker said, “This idea that you see among the neo-con right is, if you make [China] richer, eventually they’re gonna get more economic freedom. People are gonna demand more political freedom.” Bannon responded, “Oops. That was a miss,” and Decker agreed. “That was one of the biggest strategic mistakes,” said Bannon, adding, “When they look back at the history of this thing a hundred years from now, the Clinton and Bush administrations, the strategic miscalculation about China will go down in history as one of the greatest failures of the elites and the leadership of this country – the mid-nineties to up until, really, President Trump came on the scene, the whole ‘China’s gonna change.’”

Explore posts in the same categories: Trump and America First, Trump and U.S. economy, Trump's accomplishments

Tags: , ,

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

9 Comments on “Brett Decker: ‘Trump in One Year Is Already Better Than 16 Years’ of Bush, Obama ‘Put Together’”

  1. John Prophet Says:

    The Loony Left in America is now facing its Waterloo.
    It’s clear now the Clintons are finished. Pelosi and Schumer soon will be dealing with internal revolt from the next generation of Dems after their disaster in the 2018 midterms looking to push them out.
    The Deep State Of Obama/Clinton acolytes will be yanked out by the roots and tossed.

    The main stream media has been rendered naked by Trump as “fake news”. Hear that flushing sound? Yup, the swamp is being drained. Very good indeed.

    • joopklepzeiker Says:

      I,am a lot less sure about it .

      • John Prophet Says:

        We’ll see!

        The left is engaged in a soft coup attempt, trying to find anything
        to remove Trump. He knows that. The left has been on the offensive for over a year and Trump is now in full counter offensive mode.

        The problem for the Dems? Power, theirs is fading while Trumps is growing. After eight years of Obama and backed by the Clintons the Dems had seemingly an iron grip on power. Then it happened, Trump won. He took their best shot and now he’s clubbing them into the muck of the swamp! The more Trump wins, the more they lose.

      • John Prophet Says:

        By now, the Clintons were supposed to be safely ensconced in the White House. None of this was supposed to happen. Oops.

        Now, the Clintons and the Dems are being exposed.

        • John Prophet Says:

          The “elites” forgot who was really in charge. Not them thank god but “We The People”. Oops again!

        • Exactly. Now all we need to do is weed out the DOJ and FBI so this can move forward with some real justice. Trump has that covered too, along with the Office of Inspector General and the Investigate Committee in Congress.

        • John Collins Says:

          When people think they’ll not get caught that they’ll be no consequences for their actions, they push the envelope.
          The Clintons didn’t push the envelope they cut it up and threw it away. They “knew” they’d not get caught and could get away with anything. That arrogance will be their downfall.

  2. John Prophet Says:

    Resistance is crumbling as Dems start cutting deals with Trump.
    Obama/Clinton/Pelosi/Schumer sand castle is being swamped by a Trumpnami being completely washed away.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: