EU: Europeans Must Pay $280K For Each Muslim Migrant they Refuse, Front Page Magazine, Daniel Greenfield, May 4, 2016
Despite growing opposition, the EU is really doubling down on its aggressive push to distribute Muslim migrants across Europe. This is being described as “fair”, but that’s as fair as your neighbor setting his house on fire and then demanding that you either let him move in with you or he’ll set your house on fire.
Merkel decided to open the doors to any Muslim who wanted to come. Greece chose to pass them along without caring in the least what other countries would suffer. But other countries are supposed to be penalized for Merkel’s bleeding heart.
The European Commission made a proposal on Wednesday to automatically distribute asylum-seekers across the EU from member states overwhelmed by arrivals.
Depending on the number of asylum seekers in the European Union, each country would be assigned a “fair share”, based on the size of its population and economy. Should it face arrivals exceeding 1.5 times the fair share, automatic relocation would start to other EU states until it drops again.
There’s nothing fair about any of this. Nor is it much of a plan because the Muslim migrants have repeatedly said that they want to go to Germany or Sweden. And they want specific cities with large Muslim populations. Trying to send them to Poland won’t work for very long.
Countries could exempt themselves from relocation for one year at a time if they pay 250,000 euros per refugee they would otherwise need to take in to the country that accommodates the person.
The figure is meant to be “dissuasive” and is very high compared to 6,000 euros for every relocated person as offered by the European Commission last year under an emergency relocation plan that was due to cover 160,000 people.
That’s around $280K US. And rather few European countries can afford that. And since Muslim migrants keep coming, the question becomes moot anyway. As countries continue being overwhelmed, the figures will go on being recalculated.
While any reform would only apply mid- to longer-term, a calculation for Poland, the biggest eastern EU state, shows it would have to pay some 1.6 billion euros for fewer than 7,000 people it was assigned – but never took in – under the 160,000 plan.
Of course this isn’t going to shut down anything. It’s just meant to make Germans and some others feel better that other countries will do their “fair share”. It’s a political divide and conquer strategy.
Meanwhile smuggling migrants into Europe is a $7 billion business. And that’s not counting the payoffs that Turkey’s Islamist government will be getting.
Explore posts in the same categories: Europe,
European Union,
Islamic invasion
This entry was posted on May 4, 2016 at 9:29 PM and is filed under Europe, European Union, Islamic invasion. You can subscribe via RSS 2.0 feed to this post's comments.
Tags: Europe, European Union, Islamic invasion
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
WarSclerotic 
May 5, 2016 at 1:49 AM
What the price if they just shoot them?
May 5, 2016 at 2:15 AM
Depends on the caliber !
May 5, 2016 at 5:07 AM
Is a “bulk rate” available?
May 5, 2016 at 4:02 PM
London just elected one for mayor.
May 5, 2016 at 5:28 PM
Correct…seriously considering electing one.
May 5, 2016 at 6:09 PM
LS is this correct ?
http://sputniknews.com/politics/20160505/1039126892/us-political-dynasties-clinton.html
May 5, 2016 at 11:26 PM
The presumptive new Mayor of London is a Muslim radical with terrorist ties
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2016/05/05/the-presumptive-new-mayor-of-london-is-a-muslim-radical-with-terrorist-ties/
May 6, 2016 at 9:12 AM
And mozlems cheer as yet another foe falls… They’ll have to re-name “Big Ben” to “bin Allah” and turn it into a minaret.
May 6, 2016 at 3:07 PM
Sorry Joop. Just saw your question. Yes. The article is somewhat accurate. The electoral system can work for you or against you. The electors are supposed to register their vote according to the desire of the voters, but we all saw what happens with delegates in primaries. But this is not usually a problem. They, for the most part, stick with the voters. It’s the math that can throw things out of sync, especially in a close election. The same is true for long standing political influence. Such a thing could have an impact, but they would have to turn several electors against the will of the people….a dangerous thing to do in today’s environment. Besides, you ever notice that regardless of party, if the electoral college gets out of sync, the affected side always calls for reform, but it never happens. But then, it’s a constitutional issue that requires quite a task to change.
May 6, 2016 at 5:11 PM
Thanks for the clarification .
May 5, 2016 at 5:04 PM
http://www.bulkammo.com/
May 6, 2016 at 9:36 AM
Thanks for posting, joop! However, my “shopping days” are long complete. I pray most folks’ are, as well…
May 6, 2016 at 12:32 PM
I,am save and sound , but outside the USA , i,am at the other side of the wall .
And be so kind to direct the lenna’s ( social soros warriors ) to Canada .
May 6, 2016 at 1:02 PM
Will do! Be safe, my friend!
May 6, 2016 at 12:58 PM
They shot our upcoming president with 9 bullets dead .( Netherlands ) just before the elections .
He was a Patriot .
We honor him today.
Knowing that the seed is sown is the greatest reward for a teacher
https://ejbron.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/screenshot_56.png?w=761&h=447
If you wanna know more :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pim_Fortuyn
