Trump on Putin Controlling Syria: ‘OK, Fine,’ Him Fighting ISIS ‘Wonderful Thing,’ ‘Very Little Downside’
Trump on Putin Controlling Syria: ‘OK, Fine,’ Him Fighting ISIS ‘Wonderful Thing,’ ‘Very Little Downside’
29 Sep 2015
On Tuesday’s “O’Reilly Factor” on the Fox News Channel, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump stated that it’s “a wonderful thing” Russia’s Vladimir Putin is fighting ISIS and responded “Alright, okay, fine” after host Bill O’Reilly stated Putin would “never get out” of Syria.
Trump said [relevant exchange begins around 3:55] of “in terms of leadership, he’s getting an A, and our president is not doing so well.”
When asked what he thinks Putin is doing in the Middle East, Trump stated, “Well, we spent $2 trillion, thousands of lives, wounded warriors all over, and Putin is now taking over what we started, and he’s going into Syria, and he frankly wants to fight ISIS, and I think that’s a wonderful thing. You know, I said that a year ago and everybody said oh, that’s terrible. If he wants to fight ISIS, let him fight ISIS. Why do we always have to do everything. But he wants to go in. He wants to fight ISIS. Now, he wants to keep, as you know, he wants to keep your leadership, your current leadership, Assad in Syria. Personally I’ve been looking at the different players, and I’ve been watching Assad, and I’ve been pretty good at this stuff over the years, cause deals are people. And I’m looking at Assad and saying, ‘Maybe he’s better than the kind of people that we’re supposed to be backing.’ Because we don’t even know who we’re backing.”
Trump added that there’s “very little downside with Putin fighting ISIS, and Putin wants to keep ISIS out of Russia and, therefore, he’s become very active with respect to ISIS, and I think that’s to our benefit.”
O’Reilly stated, “Once Putin gets in and fights ISIS on behalf of Assad, Putin runs Syria. He owns it. He’ll never get out, never.” Trump said, “Alright, okay, fine. I mean, you know, we can be in Syria. Do you want to run Syria? Do you want to own Syria? I want to rebuild our country.”
Trump concluded, by agreeing with O’Reilly that Putin wants to run the Middle East, adding “you have huge oil reserves. You have huge — you have tremendous wealth in the Middle East that people don’t even know about. And by the way, forget about Putin. You have Iran is going to take over Iraq. I called that many years ago, on your show. I said we should have never gone into Iraq, which I should be given a little credit for vision, because I’m the only one running that said that, but we should have never, because you totally destabilize the Middle East. But the fact is that Putin now — well, that’s what happened. you destabilized, and by the way. Iran is going to be be taking over Iraq, including their vast oil reserves, and the leftovers are taken over by ISIS. So, what have we done with our incompetent leadership?”
After O’Reilly stated, “We have given the Middle East primarily to Putin and Iran, and they will run it for the foreseeable future.” Trump responded, “I believe that’s true.”
Explore posts in the same categories: UncategorizedTags: Donald Trump, Putin, Syria, Vladimir Putin
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
WarSclerotic 
September 30, 2015 at 12:26 PM
Prior to the OIL NATIONALIZATIONS of Iran in 1951 and Iraq in 1961 most of the oil resources of the world belonged to the West, the British Empire and the USA. In 1972 OPEC stunned the world with the oil embargo and Western economies shuddered. In 1975 Henry Kissinger predicted what would happen to the West if Islam was allowed to control the worlds oil supply
“Seizing Arab Oil”
https://www.dropbox.com/s/1gabsw4incrpoqp/Harpers_SeizingArabOil_Kissinger(6).pdf?dl=0
But Kissinger’s advice was ignored.
In the last forty years we’ve seen Kissinger’s apocalyptic predictions become reality.
We’ve seen what happens when the world gives TRILLIONS of dollars in oil income to Islam.
The result was and is Hell on Earth.
NOW, apparently oblivious of all the above, Trump is willing to hand the worlds oil supply to Russia and China and Iran on a silver platter.
Russia that slaughtered sixty million people in WWII, and now under Putin seeks to reestablish the Russian Empire.
Communist China that slaughtered over a hundred million people to bring Communism to China and is still bent on domination of all of Asia, if not the whole world.
And Iran, which is an apocalyptic Islamic country that seeks to force the whole world to become Islamic, and the worldwide death toll from the expansion of Islam is already well over two hundred million, and rising.
What could possibly go wrong with that ?
We saw what went wrong when we give Trillions of dollars of oil income to Islam.
What could possibly go wrong when we give Trillions of dollars of oil income to Russia and China and Iran?
What could possibly go wrong with that Mr. Trump ?
And ISIS? ISIS is piffle. It’s set dressing. It’s a distraction. In reality it’s America’s immoral attempt to keep Syria in the Sunni orbit, instead of allowing it to be captured by Iran and the Shiites. And the whole point of keeping control of Syria is so America and Saudi Arabia control the future oil pipeline routes from the Middle East to Europe. The fact that ISIS is evil is almost trivial. But by inviting Russia to take care of the ISIS problem Trump is also giving away all of Syria and control of the worlds oil supply, and THAT is not trivial.
“Very little downside” Mr. Trump ?
Me thinks there is a very BIG downside.
A very big downside indeed Mr. Trump.
September 30, 2015 at 3:32 PM
I actually agree with Trump. Why send more of our troops into yet another slaughter. Other countries stand to lose too. Besides, old Pooty is at it again and starting what I call, Operation Trojan Horse:
“A short time after the request, the Federation Council announced that it had unanimously authorized the use of Russian military force in Syria. The last time Putin sought this authorization was in early 2014 when he decided to annex the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine. His action now contradicts his assertion to CBS on Sept. 28: “Russia will not participate in any troop operations in the territory of Syria or in any other states. Well, at least we don’t plan on it right now.” – Debka 9-30-2015
September 30, 2015 at 7:24 PM
Trump just does not understand that Iran is much more dangerous than ISIS and even if Iran and Russia were to defeat ISIS that would not be a victory for the US and Israel but a victory for Iran since Iran would take the place of ISIS . The US should fight ISIS independently by supporting the Kurds, not Iran and Russia.
September 30, 2015 at 8:32 PM
But turkey does not like that !
September 30, 2015 at 7:57 PM
There is a much wider plan and design here than to just prop up and keep the Syrian regime from collapsing.The opportunity has presented to also destabilize and eventually take over Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Gulf states that are supposedly friendly and allies of the U.S..The axis of evil currently led by Russia is a formidable coalition that includes China.Putin does not forgive the Saudis for having depressed the price oil to the detriment of Russia.So the price to pay by the Saudis is the eventual overthrow of the kingdom.
Russia wants to be able to control the price of oil worldwide.Of course in cooperation with Iran and China.They will install puppet leaders in Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Gulf states.And they will create a new rebel front in Syria that will ultimately and supposedly replace the current leader there.
In the process Israel will be encircled and they will demand that it accept whatever conditions they may want to impose on the Jews.
Both Louisiana Steve and Tyrannover have very convincing arguments for the pros and cons of intervening.
Ultimately, the U.S. may be left with no choice but to intervene militarily and we will have a major war.Appeasement always leads to war in the long run.I believe all of this could have been nipped at the bud.Unfortunately, Trump might be right of our so called leaders.They are stupid.I would add to that corrupt as well.
September 30, 2015 at 8:35 PM
Short , USA has to go to war to keep the petro dollar alive and keep manipulating and blackmailing the rest of the world, to keep the first place as the biggest baddest bully on the schoolyard !
September 30, 2015 at 8:48 PM
All these military conflicts have to do with something that is the most important factor in the world nowadays.
The transition from a unipolar system (yes, lead by the US petrodollar), to a multipolar one, where the Special Drawing Rights of the IMF will be implemented in the world’s economy…
either the US (or Israel for that matter) likes it or not.
As a hint of what I’m saying, I recommend to all of you to follow the statements and actions of the Bank of International Settlements.
It has been approved already… years ago.
So this conflicts are the resistance of some part of the economic and military elite of the US in order not to loose their privileged position as the unique world’s super power.
Unfortunately, it is just a matter of time that this will happen.
The more resistance they offer to the implementation of the new system, the longer the wars will go on.
The BRICS are not going to be the new sole rulers of the world.
It will be a more balanced situation, with both hemispheres (east and west) sharing and implementing the new rules.
No apocalyptic nonsensical religious armageddon in Israel, no WW III with thermo-nuclear bombs (remember MAD theory) or no wiping out Israel off the map.
Sorry to disappoint some of the warmongers here, but I’m willing to bet money with whoever wants to that what i said will come to pass between the next 5 to 10 years.
September 30, 2015 at 10:02 PM
Short, the road to a new world order .
But how bumpy would be that road ?
Russia got the offer to join the order and was willing on equal terms, the USA did not liked that and, Russia start refusing to play along.
What to do now , simple Hegelian dialectics ( patented by the cia )
Make Russia the bad part, alienate them , and start a conflict ( Ukraine, Baltic, middle east , Libia ) , and bring in the solution , pressing Russia to give in, but Putin is a tough son of a bitch and immense popular ( more that 80 % of the population is behind him, the by the USA forced EU boycotts on Russia works just fine, but for WHO ?
Furthermore the USA sociopaths has just brought Russia and China closer together, smart foreign politics !
And Israel , who cares just 8.000.000 Jews , usable as fuse in the middle east !
September 30, 2015 at 8:57 PM
Russia already is a major supplier of oil and gas to Europe. Putin has already turned off the spigot to some European countries in the middle of Winter. But Europe is not yet totally dependent on Russian controlled oil and gas. Europe (and the US and Saudis and the Saudi’s “catpaw” ISIS and the Gulf oil Shiekdoms) are desperately trying to supply Europe thru oil pipeline routes that could run through Syria, but that can be done only if Syria is friendly to the West, i.e. if Assad is gone and Syria is not totally aligned with Iran. Putin is moving in for the kill on Syria so he can control the Syrian pipelines. Once he has that, then he WILL be able to cut off Europe’s air supply, at the flip of a switch. Then all of Europe will fall to Putin and finally allow him to fulfill his dream of a Eurasian empire from Dublin to Vladivostok.
Inviting Putin in to mop up ISIS at the cost of losing Europe and control of the world’s oil supply is not a smart move. It’s more like the cultural motif of so many folk tales where the Devil grants you three wishes… at the cost of your soul.
Putin’s success in this “New Great Game” would empower Iran, and that would not bode well for Israel. But none of this is really about Israel. This is about the clash of empires, what happens to Israel is not of much consideration either way, to either Russia or the US.
And the idea that the only way we can oppose our enemies is to go into Syria and duke it out in hand to hand combat is just wrong. If the US understood what was going on and was determined to defend its interests it has much more efficient ways of achieving a good outcome, for itself, and ultimately for everyone concerned.
September 30, 2015 at 10:57 PM
I think you’re right on the fact of understanding that this is a geopolitical thing.
The question is, what for?
May it be to see who has a bigger percentage in the future world monetary union, which the SDR’s are the first step?
Food for thought.
Re Israel, the most possible outcome when it comes to monetary and economic issues (which are the ones that count in every war), is that they will be included (though quite begrudgingly, in a larger Middle-Eastern monetary union… which will merge with other regional ones (Asia, Europe, etc…) towards the goal that the world elite has been pursuing since a long time ago, and that joop describes as the New World Order.
October 1, 2015 at 12:06 AM
A famous and extremely important letter discovered by the Spanish government in March 1943 confirms the Masonic agenda of Yalta. Written on White House stationary, the letter was dated February 20, 1943, and was signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. It was addressed to a Jewish Freemason named Zabrousky, who was then acting as a liaison officer between President Roosevelt and Stalin. The letter reads:
Dear Mr. Zabrousky,
The United States and Great Britain are ready, without any reservations, to give the U.S.S.R. absolute parity and voting rights in the future reorganization of the post-war world. She will therefore take part (as the English Prime Minister let him know when sending him the first draft from Aden) in the directing group in the heart of Councils of Europe and of Asia; she has a right to this, not only through her vast intercontinental situation, but above all because of her magnificent struggle against Nazism which will win the praise of history and civilization.
It is our intention – I speak on behalf of our great country and of the mighty British Empire – that these continental councils be constituted by the whole of the independent states in each case, with equitable proportional representation.
And you can, my dear Mr. Zabrousky, assure Stalin that the U.S.S.R. will find herself on a footing of complete equality, having an equal voice with the United States and England in the direction of the said Councils. Equally with England and the United States, she will be a member of the high tribunal which will be created to resolve differences between the nations, and she will take part similarly and identically in the selection, preparation, armament and command of the international forces which, under the orders of the Continental Council will keep watch within each State to see that peace is maintained in the spirit worthy of the League of Nations. Thus these inter-State entities and their associated armies [international police force] will be able to impose their decisions and to make themselves obeyed.
This being the case, a position so elevated in the tetrarchy of the universe ought to give Stalin enough satisfaction not to renew claims which are capable of creating insoluble problems for us.
In this way, the American continent will remain outside all Soviet influence and within the exclusive concern of the United States, as we have promised the countries of our continent it shall.
In Europe, France will gravitate into the British orbit. We have reserved for France a secretariat with a consultative voice but without voting rights, as a reward for her present resistance and as a penalty for her former weakness.
Portugal, Spain, Italy and Greece will develop under the protection of England towards a modern civilization which will lift them out of their historical decline.
We will grant the U.S.S.R. an access to the Mediterranean; we will accede to her wishes concerning Finland and the Baltic and we shall require Poland to show a judicious attitude of comprehension and compromise; Stalin will still have a wide field for expansion in the little, unenlightened countries of Eastern Europe – always taking into account the rights which are due to the fidelity of Yugoslavia and Czecho-Slovakia – and he will completely recover the territories which have been temporarily snatched from great Russia.
Most important of all: after the partition of the Third Reich and the incorporation of its fragments with other territories to form new nationalities which will have no link with the past, the German threat will conclusively disappear in so far as being any danger to the U.S.S.R., to Europe and to the entire world.
Turkey – but it will serve no useful purpose to discuss that question further, it needs full understanding and Churchill has given the necessary assurances to President Inonu, in the name of us both. The access to the Mediterranean contrived for Stalin ought to content him.
Asia – we are in agreement with his demands, except for any complications which may arise later. As for Africa – again what need for discussion? We must give something back to France and even compensate her for her losses in Asia. It will be necessary to give Egypt something, as has already been promised to the Wafdist government. As regards Spain and Portugal, they will have to be recompensed for the renunciations necessary to achieve better universal balance.
The United States will also share in the distribution by right of conquest and they will be obliged to claim some points which are vital for their zone of influence; that is only fair. Brazil, too, must be given the small colonial expansion which has been offered to her.
In view of the rapid annihilation of the Reich, convince Stalin – my dear Mr. Zabrousky – that he ought to give way, for the good of all, in the matter of the colonies in Africa, and to abandon all propaganda and intervention in the industrial centers of America. Assure him also of my complete understanding and of my entire sympathy and desire to facilitate these solutions, which makes more timely than ever the personal discussion which I propose – the above is only a general outline of a plan which is intended for further study.
This is the issue and the whole issue.
(Signed Franklin Roosevelt)
October 1, 2015 at 12:09 AM
Early in 1943 — on February 20, to be exact — Roosevelt wrote a secret letter to Stalin, in which he explained his own plan for “the tetrarchy of the Universe”. (Yes, they are Roosevelt’s own words!) The letter was 21 brought to Moscow by two members of the National Council for Young Israel, Zabrousky and Weiss, whose mission was to convince Stalin to support the creation of the state of Israel. The message “to our common friend Stalin” states, inter alia:
The United States and Great Britain are disposed — without any kind of moral reservation — to give absolute equality of vote to the USSR in the future organization of the world (and membership in) the leading group at the heart of the Council of Europe and of the Council of Asia. By these means the intercontinental expansion of the USSR will be justified…
In these conditions, benefiting by such a high position in the tetrarchy of the Universe, Stalin ought to be content… We yield to their wishes regarding Finland and the Baltic. – – –
Stalin will be left with a wide field of expansion in the small countries of Eastern Europe. – – –
Please inform Stalin, dear Mr. Zabrousky, that…all these are only a general outline to be further studied…. Transmit also the assurance of my full understanding, of my sympathy and my desire to ease the solution of those problems.[4]
Lots and i mean LOTS more here.
http://www.latvians.com/index.php?en/CFBH/StalinSveics/HSGTBS-060-FDRawards.wiki
October 1, 2015 at 12:12 AM
The 3 Free masons !
September 30, 2015 at 11:20 PM
Could you kindly elaborate as to which efficient ways the U.S, has to achieve a good outcome?
October 1, 2015 at 12:29 AM
just to open the eyes a bit more for the not Europeans, historical facts, nasty but in the past lays the future .
Dig into the great war (ww1)
Otto von Hapsburg ( part of the elite )
Early in January 1944, Otto von Hapsburg talked with Roosevelt about Central Europe and reported:
The President had indicated that the countries he had told the Russians they could take over and control 26 completely as their sphere – so completely that the United States could from this moment on have no further policies with regard to them were: Rumania, Bulgaria, Bukovina, Eastern Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia and Finland.[13]
http://www.latvians.com/index.php?en/CFBH/StalinSveics/HSGTBS-060-FDRawards.wiki
October 1, 2015 at 12:31 AM
That is how you trow countries under a bus !
Can you see clearly now , the rain is gone , Joop supplied an umbrella !
October 1, 2015 at 12:42 AM
Just warming up !
Who financed Lenin and Trotsky?
http://www.wildboar.net/multilingual/easterneuropean/russian/literature/articles/whofinanced/whofinancedleninandtrotsky.html
October 1, 2015 at 1:10 AM
joop,
yes, free masonry controls the world.
They have since centuries ago.
This new world order they are planning, and that they will implement soon, is their final goal.
As far as I’m concerned, they can all go to hell.
Finally, yes, Wall Street and the US big Jewish banking families financed the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia.
Rothschild, Warburg, Schiff, etc…
Maybe you have already, but if you haven’t, read Anthony C. Sutton’s book “Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution”.
It’s free online.
October 1, 2015 at 1:26 AM
Thanks, I will look that book up , i,am bound to the couch at the moment and can use something to read laying on my back.