Netanyahu: I didn’t want an Israeli Fallujah in Gaza

Netanyahu: I didn’t want an Israeli Fallujah in Gaza
By Itamar Sharon August 30, 2014, 10:16 pm Via Times of Israel

Never take your eye off the ball.

(Bibi’s right. Why send your young and brave soldiers into the meat grinder? That’s exactly what Hamas wants. It’s the only way they can kill in larger numbers and they know it.-LS)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Saturday defended his decision-making throughout Operation Protective Edge in the Gaza Strip. Responding to a wave of public criticism and dissatisfaction with the results of the war against Hamas, he maintained that his government had acted responsibly, and said he didn’t want an Israeli “Fallujah” in Gaza.

Netanyahu told Channel 2 in a lengthy interview that he did not rule out reconquering Gaza and uprooting Hamas in the future — as many of his critics and detractors have demanded — if conditions necessitated such a move, but warned that such drastic action would come at a heavy price and would carry lasting consequences for Israel.

In order to drive home his point, Netanyahu referenced the US’s war in Iraq and specifically the many battles and heavy casualties it suffered in its attempt to cleanse the city of Fallujah of militant forces, an attempt which he said was quickly undone once the military left the territory.

“The US fought against a smaller Gaza called Fallujah… Fallujah is a tenth the size of Gaza. The great United States fought in Fallujah, its Gaza, sacrificed hundreds of soldiers who fought bravely… Went in once, twice, three times,” he said.

Gunmen patrol during clashes with Iraqi security forces in Fallujah, 40 miles (65 kilometers) west of Baghdad, Iraq, January 5, 2014 (photo credit: AP)

“Thousands of Iraqis were killed there. Many thousands. And in the end it went out and al-Qaeda came back.”

Netanyahu said he believed an attempt to conquer Gaza temporarily in order to oust Hamas would carry a similarly high cost in soldiers’ lives as well as in civilian casualties. “If we pay those prices, and they are heavy prices, we may need to stay there,” he said. But such a continued presence would waste precious resources at a time when Israel must also contend with threats on other fronts.

“We have al-Qaeda on the fence now in the Golan Heights,” he noted, referring to the al-Qaeda-linked al-Nusra Front which in recent days has taken over territory adjacent to the Israeli border, including Syria’s only border crossing with Israel. “The Islamic State is racing towards us and al-Qaeda is on the Golan borders… I chose in this reality not to invest all of our resources in this one arena (Gaza).”

“I believed that what we should do at this time is simply to pound them. So maybe they remain [in power] but they are pulverized; they are isolated; they cannot smuggle weaponry,” Netanyahu said. He noted that the objectives of the operation had never been to topple Hamas, only to hit it heavily enough to deter it and curtail its ability to attack Israel.

“We’ve done this,” he maintained. “We’ve dealt them a terrible, terrible blow… We’ve given Hamas a thrashing that it will remember for many years.”

“I think this creates a chance — not a certainty but a chance – for us to have lasting quiet,” he added.

Netanyahu spoke of zero tolerance for a “drizzle” of rocket attacks, vowing to hit hard in response to any further rocket-fire from Gaza. “Drizzles will be answered with a downpour” of Israeli fire, he said.

Netanyahu also downplayed his not-so-private clashes over the handling of the operation with certain government ministers, namely Economy Minister Naftali Bennett and Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman, who have both made no secret of their contempt for his reluctance to topple Hamas.

“There was some creaking,” he admitted, but said that in the end, “up to this point the government has acted as it should.”

The prime minister claimed not to be too worried about criticism against him, saying he believed much of the public recognized that the campaign had been waged responsibly and with levelheadedness.

“In the face of all the criticisms, in the face of all the critics, in the face of all the background noise and private interests – I was unfazed and I was very determined,” he said.

Opinion polls in recent days have shown a fall in support for Netanyahu, and Liberman has led criticism of the failure to topple Hamas. Liberman said Friday that Israel wasted a golden opportunity to eradicate Hamas.

Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, for her part, said Saturday that the government must either renew peace talks with the Palestinian Authority or brace for a diplomatic backlash from the international community.

Speaking about the now seemingly abandoned peace process with the Palestinian Authority, Netanyahu said the recent conflict in Gaza had brought home to many Israelis how dangerous Palestinian sovereignty in the West Bank could be if Israel’s safety was not guaranteed.

“My insistence on the security issue is now better understood, I think. The problem of demilitarization which I believe is not only true for Gaza but for [the West Bank] as well: Who will prevent tunnels from being dug? Who will prevent rockets from being manufactured? Who will demilitarize the territory?” he asked. “You can’t talk about a diplomatic process without talking about security.”

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, he said, would have to choose between Hamas and Israel.

“The choice I spoke of months ago has proven itself not be true but super-true. It’s either Hamas or peace…Hamas doesn’t just threaten us, it was about to overthrow him, to carry out a coup,” he said, referring to Israel’s recent reveal of a Hamas network in the West Bank which allegedly sought to topple the PA.

The premier elaborated, if only slightly, on his recent cryptic comments on new “diplomatic horizons” which had opened up to the Jewish state saying “There is a not-insignificant number of nations which see the threats around us as threats to them [as well]. As a result they are treating Israel not as an enemy but as a potential partner.

“Whether this partnership in the face of dangers will also lead to partnership on opportunities is something we will have to look into soberly and responsibly,” he said.

“I’ve never had any illusions about the Middle East,” he added wryly. “When the Arab Spring, the so-called Arab Spring erupted, I said there wouldn’t be any great liberal [forces] coming forward, that there would rise Islamic movements” he said, in likely reference to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and to Islamic State and other extremist groups that have arisen in recent years out of the conflict in Syria and other nations.

But in the joint need to fight these groups, he said, “there may be a basis for new partnerships, and these partnerships can create opportunities – both security-related and diplomacy-related.”


Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

4 Comments on “Netanyahu: I didn’t want an Israeli Fallujah in Gaza”

  1. Mark Says:


    I have to disagree with you again. The war against Islamic extremists can’t be won with air strikes and begging for ceasefires.

    Bibi’s attempt to use Hussein’s withdraw from Iraq to justify his own weakness is wrong on both counts.

    And leaving Hamas standing to rearm and fight Israel once more at a time of it’s choosing does nothing to strengthen Israel’s hand against Iran.

    And finally, Bibi has had 5 years to keep his promise to stop Iran and has failed to do so despite all of his worthless red lines.

    Bibi has run out of chances for me and it’s time for him to go!

    • Ira Says:

      Gaza = Faluja?
      How many rockets fired from Faluja landed on American soil?
      And how many rockets aimed at American cities did Obama leave behind in Faluja?

    • Louisiana Steve Says:

      I never said I agree with Bibi that air strikes and ceasefires are the only answer. What I’m saying is I do not agree with door to door warfare exposing IDF soldiers to the risks of meeting up with a crazed armed ‘soldier’ of Hamas in a dark stairwell.

      I do, however, feel that the total and complete destruction of Hamas could be accomplished with an intensive carpet bombing campaign accompanied with a complete blockade of Gaza. That, my friend, would end it for sure, but the international community would go nuts.

      • Ira Says:

        Hmmm if you”re already talking about carpet bombing which would quickly result in tens if not hundreds of thousands of Gazan casualties, so why not a few nice bunker busters on Hamas HQ (we all know where that is)? That would probably expediate surrender. Problem is these are war crimes which the Jooo is not allowed to dooo.
        Meanwhile, speaking of war crimes, this seems to be motus opperando of most of the factions of our enemies in dealing with each other, so wth let them keep it up.

Leave a Reply to Mark Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s