Gaza ceasefire talks: Easing of blockade, but no demilitarization
Gaza ceasefire talks: Easing of blockade, but no demilitarization
Details of agreement obtained by Ynet show Hamas to receive overdue salary payments, construction materials will enter under close supervision.
Attila SomfalviPublished: 08.12.14, 00:47 / Israel News
via Gaza ceasefire talks: Easing of blockade, but no demilitarization – Israel News, Ynetnews.
Israel has agreed to ease the closure on the Gaza Strip, according to information obtained by Ynet regarding an apparent agreement between Hamas and Israel, achieved via Egyptian mediation at the negotiations currently underway in Cairo. In contrast, there is no agreement to demilitarize Gaza, as demanded by Israel.
Ynet has learned that Israel will agree to transfer the Hamas government salaries through a third party – facilitating the payment of Hamas officials’ salaries. It was further agreed that Israel would gradually expand the fishing area off the Gaza coast, initially expected to be six nautical miles. It was also decided that construction materials will enter Gaza under close supervision.
Another issue close to agreement is that Israel will double the number of trucks entering Gaza through the Kerem Shalom crossing to approximately 600 trucks per day. Similarly, a decision by Israel to increase the monthly quota of permits for entry into the Gaza Strip through the Erez crossing is also close to being finalized. At the same time, criteria for entry into Israel from the Gaza Strip and the West Bank will be broadened.
In the negotiations held Monday, the parties did not reach an understanding regarding the Gaza ports. Hamas sources in the Gaza Strip said Monday evening that it would be possible to delay in dealing with the airport and seaport if Israel agrees to the rest of their requirements. The sources noted that such a situation would still require an agreement in principle for the establishment of the ports.
Israel is at present opposed to the establishment of air and sea ports in Gaza for fear they would be used by Hamas and other factions to smuggle weapons.
“The problem is not just the port,” said former Military Intelligence chief Major General (res.) Amos Yadlin several days ago. “If it were only the port, I think it could be stipulated that only monitored, civilian arrivals would be allowed. It would take four years to build, and Israel has already agreed in the past to a port in Gaza, during Yasser Arafat’s time.”
Regarding the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt – not a direct issue for Israel – it seems that the Egyptians and the Palestinians are moving toward handing control over to Palestinian Authority forces loyal to Mahmoud Abbas.
A source close to the Palestinian delegation in Cairo said Monday night that the talks between the Palestinian delegation and Israeli delegation had been continuously ongoing since 1 pm, with Egyptian mediation, with no set schedule. According to the source, the negotiations have been thorough and difficult, but the common denominator is that all parties are interested in reaching agreement and not returning to a further escalation of violence.
Israel’s delegation returned home Monday evening, and is expected to head back to Cairo Tuesday for further talks. The delegation includes Shin Bet chief Yoram Cohen; Defense Ministry Director of Policy and Political-Military Affairs Amos Gilad; Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s envoy Yitzhak Molcho; Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories Gen. Yoav Mordechai and Head of the IDF Planning Directorate Major General Nimrod Shefer.
No demilitarization, no port
Meanwhile, the Security Cabinet was to convene at noon Tuesday to hear the details of the agreements reached so far. A political source said that the issue of demilitarization, although it became a key talking point for Netanyahu during the fighting, was not expected to be included in the final agreement, and certainly not by Hamas.
“Hamas cannot say that it agreed to demilitarization, but the important thing is that the issue was raised,” the source said. While Israel wanted rehabilitation in return for demilitarization in Gaza, it is will likely to have to make do with making life easier for the Gazans without Hamas giving any guarantees it will decommission its weapons.
It seems that during the talks in Cairo, the demilitarization requirement was shelved along with Hamas’ demands for a seaport and airport. Cabinet ministers have made it clear that a port will be built if Hamas agrees to extreme demilitarization.”
Several ministers have expressed dissatisfaction with the fact that the talks in Cairo were conducted without informing them of their progress.
“When the agreements are presented, the ministers will rubber-stamp them because it would be very difficult to change any items,” said one minister.
It has not yet been clarified whether there will be a Cabinet vote on the agreements reached in Cairo.
Elior Levy and Roi Kais contributed to this report
Explore posts in the same categories: UncategorizedTags: Anti Semitism, Gaza war, Hamas, IDF, Islam, Israel, Jihad, Operation Protective Edge, PA, Palestinians
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
WarSclerotic 
August 12, 2014 at 1:26 AM
All baloney. This war is far from over. It is going to be a big balagon. America just sold Qatar, a nation of 2 million, 11 billion dollars in arms. Goodness knows how much Qatar is purchasing from other sources. Israel will be facing those arms shortly.
August 12, 2014 at 1:59 AM
Yep, but perhaps it is the tactic from Israel to ride the black hand out, just 2 years more or so !
August 12, 2014 at 4:41 PM
I have this nagging thought in the back on my mind that says maybe the Obama administration wants ISIS to advance. After all, isn’t military aid to Qatar really aid to ISIS? Besides, Obama has been dying to dump Maliki. And what about Iran and Syria? Isn’t ISIS threatening them both?
Unfortunately, ISIS is a bit too ‘ambitious’ by slaughtering innocents and putting a lot of political heat on BHO. As a result, he’s forced to mount a token response. Note that one report even suggested Obama bombed an ISIS convoy of 200 or so American ‘citizens’ fighting for ISIS. A lot can be inferred there, i.e. warding off future attacks in the US.
If my hunch is correct, look for ISIS to scale back it’s shocking behavior (to say the least) in order to continue it’s drive to Iran without any real resistance. Iraq is probably just a stepping stone to the big prize that is Iran. As they close in on Iran, I’d look for Tehran to get chummy with BHO and even somewhat agreeable on other fronts.
But then it’s just a hunch. I could be entirely wrong.
August 12, 2014 at 4:50 PM
But where does this left Israel, thrown under the bus ?
August 12, 2014 at 5:29 PM
Again…this is my nagging thought talking…
Actually, Israel is one of Obamas biggest ‘untouchables’. Further engagement with Israel by others in the Arab world would jeopardize his current and future plans and is not tolerated. You can see this by the relative tranquility of other Arab countries towards Israel that has manifested itself for some time now.
Furthermore, Turkey will succumb to more pressure to leave Israel alone. After all, they are part of NATO, and Russia is too close and too unpredictable. They need us more than we need them.
As for Hamas, they strayed from the plan and Israel enjoyed the political support to act accordingly. However, hostilities will not be allowed to boil over… only simmer at the current level. In the end, Hamas will be disenfranchised, but not totally defeated. They may, however, evolve into something else as so many have done before.
Obama only has two more years. He’s running out of time so, as a result, we will continue to see ISIS growing like nothing before it. Again, the big prize is Iran. Obama hasn’t gotten his way with them yet. ISIS will be their punishment. He won’t finish the job with Iran. He knows it and that pisses him off. Obama is a student of ‘revenge politics’ and lives by it in everything he does as president.
In the end, Obama will leave ISIS to the next president to deal with.
…need a break…getting a headache. 🙂