Iran: Geneva talks are ‘complicated and tough’
Iran: Geneva talks are ‘complicated and tough’ | The Times of Israel.
Russian FM en route to join talks after discordant meeting between EU foreign policy chief and Iranian FM; uranium enrichment remains a sticking point
November 22, 2013, 4:00 pm
EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, second left, and Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, third right, are pictured during talks over Iran’s nuclear program in Geneva, Switzerland, on Friday (photo credit: AP/Fabrice Coffrini)
GENEVA — Differences on whether Iran has the right to enrich uranium that could be used to make nuclear weapons appeared to be a key sticking point Friday between two top negotiators trying to agree on terms that would start curbing Tehran’s atomic activities in exchange for sanctions relief.
Hopes of an imminent deal remained alive, however, as the Russian Foreign Ministry announced that it’s chief, Sergey Lavrov, was heading to Geneva Friday afternoon.
Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and Catherine Ashton, the European Union’s top diplomat, have met repeatedly since Wednesday to hammer out language on a nuclear deal acceptable to both Tehran and six world powers, the P5+1, trying to limit Iran’s nuclear program.
The negotiations were supposed to be held between the six and Tehran, but those talks have been put on hold except for a brief meeting Wednesday. Instead, Zarif and Ashton have met numerous times seeking to agree on a text that she would take to the six for approval.
The two met again briefly Friday for talks that Iran’s official IRNA news agency described as “complicated and tough.” It quoted Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi in Geneva that Iran’s right to uranium enrichment must be part of any deal.
“We’re currently working on a text, the majority of provisions of which there is common understanding on, and this points to progress,” Araqchi was quoted as saying by Iran’s IRNA news agency.
“If the other side show flexibility, we can reach an agreement. If the (P5+1) is not flexible in its excessive demands, the negotiations will not progress.”
Iran says it is enriching only for reactor fuel, medical uses and research. But the technology can also produce nuclear warhead material.
Zarif last weekend indicated that Iran is ready to sign a deal that does not expressly state Iran’s right to enrich, raising hopes that a deal could be sealed at the current Geneva round.
On Wednesday, however, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said his country would never compromise on “red lines.” Since then Tehran has reverted to its original line — that the six powers must recognize this activity as Iran’s right under the nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty despite strong opposition by Israel and within the US Congress.
A senior Iranian negotiator said that the Iranian claim did not need to be explicitly recognized in any initial deal, despite Khamenei’s comment. He did suggest, however, that language on that point remained contentious, along with other differences. He demanded anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the diplomatic maneuvering.
Sanctions relief was also an issue.
The United States and its allies have signaled they are ready to ease some sanctions in return for a first-step deal that starts to put limits on Iran’s nuclear program. But they insist that the most severe penalties — on Tehran’s oil exports and banking sector — will remain until the two sides reach a comprehensive agreement to minimize Iran’s nuclear arms-making capacity.
Iran says it does not want such weapons and has indicated it’s ready to start rolling back its program but wants greater and faster sanctions relief than that being offered.
Several Democrat and Republican senators have voiced displeasure with the parameters of the potential agreement, arguing that the US and its partners are offering too much for something short of a full freeze on uranium enrichment.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday that he would support legislation to expand sanctions against Iran, though he said he also backs the negotiating effort. Reid said the threat of more sanctions was essential to get an acceptable deal.
Sen. Bob Corker, the Republicans’ top member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, on Thursday proposed a bill outlining a final agreement, including an end to all Iranian enrichment activity, and seeking to restrict President Barack Obama’s capacity to offer sanctions relief.
The Russian Foreign Ministry announced Friday that Lavrov was flying to Geneva Friday to take part in the Iran talks.
The ministry said in a statement carried by Russian news agencies that Lavrov may also meet in Geneva with UN’s top Syrian envoy, Lakhdar Brahimi.
Lavrov said Wednesday that he could meet with US Secretary of State John Kerry this week, but didn’t specify where the meeting would take place.
Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized
WarSclerotic 
November 22, 2013 at 9:00 PM
Zarif is fucking Ashton I opine.
November 22, 2013 at 9:50 PM
Doesn’t look good.
The Guardian: Iran nuclear deal closer as diplomats gather in Geneva
Russian and Chinese foreign ministers join their negotiating teams as sources say draft deal is close to being signed
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/22/iran-nuclear-deal-close-diplomats-geneva
“… Diplomats in Geneva said talks had whittled down the number of sticking points to a small handful. There were also unconfirmed reports that one of the most intractable issues, the question of Iran’s right to enrich uranium, had been resolved with a form of words in the draft agreement that satisfied both sides.
Sources said the most important remaining obstacle was the extent to which work should be allowed to continue at a heavy water reactor in Arak, which would produce plutonium when completed.
“Yesterday we talked about the issues we don’t agree on, and naturally delegations needed to consult their capitals. In some cases, we have had results,” the Iranian foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, who leads the country’s delegation, said. “In some cases a number of phrases have been added [to the text] and we still need to do some work in other cases. We are dealing with an issue that was the subject of difference for 10 years.”
The draft deal on the table is intended to buy six months for further negotiations aimed at an enduring settlement. Iran would get access to some frozen bank accounts and could start trading again in gold, petrochemicals, vehicle and aeroplane parts. In exchange, Iran would stop or reverse different parts of its nuclear programme. …”
November 23, 2013 at 12:36 AM
As French Foreign minister said today:
“As long as there is no agreement, there is no agreement”
You have to remember the diplomats have been telling us a deal with Iran was close for a decade now.
I for one won’t fret over Kerry traveling to Geneva yet again.
Even if France has caved on enrichment, Arak is the biggest sticking point of all. Highly doubtful France will cave on that (and we know Iran won’t).