From our Luis…
–
–
Oct 29, 10:01 am
The correct time for an Israeli Operation in Iran is now, in the following days. I’ll explain why. ”Obama’s Administration” and 0bama itself are under heavy – I’ll say atomic(!) – pressure right now because of the countless failures of Obama’s regime.
A preemptive Israeli strike in Iran will be another frog that this president will have to swallow; in a way, he might be happy if such a thing will happen, because he desperately needs a media distraction, some sort of media decoy, which will get him rid of this all out American media offensive on the White House, right now. As we speak, the 0bama’s situation is almost unbearable. There are too many problems which, like throwing stones, are hitting the WH windows day and night.
Israel should take the initiative now and resolve its problems.
We think that Bibi got his second chance. The first, was before the elections and not acting then was a fateful mistake from the Israeli part.
Not acting now, with such a chaotic conjecture in the WH, will be Bibi’s last mistake. Iran should not be aloud to develop any nuclear program. In fact, in the actual situation between Israel and Iran, Iran should not be allowed to continue as a trouble making state in the region. Better do it now, when many millions here are still alive.
via WordPress.com.
Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized
WarSclerotic 
October 29, 2013 at 1:26 PM
Hi Luis,
I think Bibi will wait for the Nov 7-8 P5+1 meeting results first, then decide based on the meeting results. He also need to wait for the new moon.
October 29, 2013 at 2:38 PM
I hope he wont wait for anything anymore, because the sands of time have vanished, already. There is no need for us to wait for that conference to be concluded. As we all already know by now, all this Iranian American Romance, has been put in place a long time ago and its only smoke and mirrors that we are seeing now. 0bama – Jarrett tandem want a piece of the president legacy puzzle : an agreement with the Iranians and the opening of the diplomatic relations between the USA and Urania, sorry I meant Iran. All the remaining issues and allies are, from that point of view, non relevant for the American ”team”. Nobody is meaning business there, anymore. Israel, as I already said, should boldly act as soon as they can.
Regarding the fool moon issue, no problems with that. No WWII raids style will be implemented here. The full Moon is something to look at and love, but the IAF doesn’t need that factor, anymore.
Regards.
October 29, 2013 at 1:35 PM
Luis I can not wait for you articles I know they are going to be very informative you and JW seems to have the right pulse on this issue
October 29, 2013 at 1:37 PM
Thank you, Tom.
October 29, 2013 at 3:24 PM
One small grammatical correction in usage Luis-
I think you meant ‘allowed’ when you typed ‘aloud.’
October 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM
Thanks, TB… Fixed.
October 29, 2013 at 5:36 PM
100 per cent, Thunderbunny. Thx. Such type of mistake must and should be corrected, because its not a ”small” one, as you, being polite, have said.
October 29, 2013 at 4:05 PM
Hi Luis,
Thanks for the reply. But I guess Bibi is waiting for the diplomacy to fail after Nov 7-8 P5+1 meeting so that he feels he has the domestic and international legal grounds to strike. But the risk is that if a bad deal comes out of Nov 7-8 P5+1 meeting, Bibi will not have any legal ground to strike if a US-Russia-Iran deals (http://www.debka.com/article/23393/Mystery-of-missing-ayatollah-Ali-Khamenei%E2%80%99s-three-week-seclusion-for-work-on-nuclear-deal-with-US) comes true. Thanks.
October 29, 2013 at 4:20 PM
very thought provoking. thanks to everyone. I am hoping that Bibi will move the process forward….ASAP!!
October 29, 2013 at 5:29 PM
Irrespective of the outcome of the Nov.7-8 P5+ 1 meeting,should Israel decide to attack Iran,Israel will be held to violating international law by attacking Iran.More so if the US-Russian-Iran deal is legally consumated-which has been already done privately IMHO and simply will be announced at the conference.Very dark times await the world and in particular Israel.Due to the very violent attack Israel will employ against Iran-Israel will not be looked upon kindly by the rest of the world with a few exceptions.Russia will threaten Israel with military intervention and the U.S. will not back Israel under those circumstances.It will be another Bay of Pigs,where the late President Kennedy decided at the last moments of that invasion to not give the air support to the Cuban exiles invading Cuba.The rest is history as to the outcome of that conflict.Hopefully another more sane outcome will prevail in the Israel -Iran conflict.
October 29, 2013 at 5:48 PM
No direct military Russian involvement is to be expected if Israel will blitz Iran. Its not going to happen, because of the grave implications of this intervention.[ look into Wikipedia, The Samson Option, subject that I have debated here, before a couple of days] The world is with the big winners, and a great Israeli victory over Iran will not pass unobserved by the great powers, the US included. In his actual uneasy political position, Obama should back up Israel in case of an Israeli decisive victory. So is not Cuba we are talking about here, and its not even the ’67 Six Days War.
A rapid blitz and victory over Iran will also reinstate Israel as a world power and certain countries will think twice, in the future, before messing with us.
October 29, 2013 at 5:48 PM
Hi CARLOS LIZARRAGA IN MIAMI,
Yes, we all hope for a peaceful resolution for this conflict. Hope a true solution will come out of Nov 7-8 P5+1 meeting so that both sides are happy with a peaceful resolution. Thanks.
October 29, 2013 at 5:58 PM
The solution that comes will leave Israel totally handcuffed. Sad but true. People, the time for action has long passed. Hoping against hope is not a strategy, but that’s what left.
October 29, 2013 at 6:36 PM
I wasn’t speaking about a peaceful solution. I was speaking about Israel blitzing and have a rapid and decisive victory over Iran. That is the solution. The ”peace” we’ll leave to the ayatollahs. The eternal one.
October 29, 2013 at 7:17 PM
Luis, I admire your tenacity of hope, I really do. Unfortunatly, the odds are stacking up agaist israel. An Israel attack could start a wider conflagation which no one wants. The world will do everything in its power to keep that from happening, perhapes even militarily.
October 29, 2013 at 7:41 PM
John I think you right that the world does not want a wider conflict . then the world should stop Iran now ! .
October 29, 2013 at 7:46 PM
Could not agree more, but, the world/Obama and I’m afraid even Bibi do not have the huevos for the job.
October 29, 2013 at 8:12 PM
First of all, really thx for the nice words of appreciation. Secondly, may be you don’t even know how right you are. An Israeli attack, now, is very problematic and this is an understatement. Nobody wants any wars anymore. The US is tired after more than ten years of wars against terror. The Great Britain doesn’t want any involvement anymore, they even weren’t agree for an ”incredible small” action in Syria. Obama ”himself” did a retreat from that issue and its ”own” red line”. The Britain Parliament has spoken. End of road there. Every body are running like hell in the Iranian direction, because the new Iran image will save Europe and America from an uncertain situation -and may be a war – in the middle east. [This is the European-American thinking]
Its a very complex game of cards here. Its the new geopolitical middle east card game, where the stakes couldn’t be more higher.
However, certain wild cards should be taken into consideration.
Such a wild card is Israel, and this is also in the general accept of the majority of the analysts.
Because Iran is relatively not far from Israel – not so far as it is from, lets say , the USA – the tools of analyze are very different in Israel in comparison with Euro-American camp. In this case, a nuclear Iran is a mortal threat for Israel. Now, lets explain this assertion. If Saudi Arabia should go nuclear, Israel should not worry too much, at least not like in the Iranian case. And why is that? Very simple : Iran declared war on Israel when its leaders told the world how they would ”take care” of the Jewish State. In such a situation, Iran should not be allowed(thanks again, Thunderbunny) to become nuclear(in fact, Iran is almost a nuclear state). And why in the world is Iran so dangerous for Israel if it will have The Bomb? The following explanation is not for our friend here, John, but for the Europeans leaders who think that Israel is on the Moon and Iran is on Jupiter. In other words, this issue is not their concerning. So, why a nuclear Iran is death for Israel? Because, if Iran will launch, lets say, three missiles equipped with nuclear warheads in Israel direction, in the north, center and south, no more Israel will be left here. Even two nuclear missiles will be too much. In that case, will be an Israeli retaliation but not only in Iran’s direction. And here is the tonight scoop here, for the first time, on this site(thx John for creating the ambiance for it) :
Israel will retaliate -the second strike capability- with Jericho III missiles – 6,000 km range – in the direction of a specific country who helped the Iranians in their atomic project.[see also the Samson Option, Wikipedia]
So, not an Israeli attack on Iran, now, will trigger a world wide conflict, but waiting for a nuclear Iran to execute its own plans, that will be the trigger for a new world war. By terminating the Iranian threat, Israel, in fact, is saving the lives of millions of people, even though this future potentially victims are not recognizing this fact right now. This is the supreme moral motivation Bibi was looking for: Israel is fighting the fight of the good guys against the bad guys, saving in the process an incalculable number of human lives.
The Israeli Army knows its job. It will be done in an exemplary manner. Like it always did.
October 29, 2013 at 8:38 PM
Iran AND North Korea, Yikes Luis you’re talking a major shit storm that’s going to bring in China. Sorry but just don’t see that happening. The “peace path” has Israel shackled and cooling its heels held in place by Obama. Obama can apply much leverage on Netanyahu strong arming him into place. No war for the foreseeable future.
October 29, 2013 at 10:09 PM
In YOUR foreseeable future, you mean.
John, it’s time you admit that you are as clueless as anyone here as to what will happen.
“If you think you know what the hell is going on, you’re probably full of shit.”
– Robert Anton Wilson
October 29, 2013 at 8:56 PM
First of all, I don’t see any Obama. Do you see one? I my self cannot. But I see that witch – bitch, Valerie Jarrett who was absolutely dead wishing that Bibi will do a job on her. This is John, mon cher , the root of the problem. Let these two being together behind the same door and in the same room and I’ll guarantee you, John, a sudden change in the USA politics in the region and in the entire world. Obama will have to wait outside that door like a good sport, while Bibi and Valerie will improve the ”relations” between Israel and America in some incredible ways. Both will be in good ”positions” to be ”satisfied” with the process. Got it, John?
Forget about wars, John. We’ll make only love.
October 29, 2013 at 8:42 PM
http://www.debka.com/article/23395/With-prisoners’-release-Palestinians-demand-Israel-withdraw-to-1949-lines-renounce-E-Jerusalem
Next stop the sea. What a slippery slope Oslo began!!
October 29, 2013 at 8:58 PM
What? Now you see Bibi and Valerie at sea? You are a really romantic, John. Keep dreaming. Its so beautiful.
October 29, 2013 at 9:28 PM
Not looking to be controversial Luis, just calling it as I see it. But it’s just my opinion,I could most certainly be full of beans.
October 29, 2013 at 10:09 PM
You can be controversial , John. Its ok. What its not ok is the fact that you are not reading my ”fabulous” lines and you are not referring to them when you answer to me, under the word ”reply”.
You see John, my friend, when two persons are talking to each other and they are not referring to what the previous person said or wrote in his previous comment, they are maintaining a deaf dialogue.
I hope you’ll read this answer – my answer – to the end and you will be so kind to read once again my previous, more elaborate comment. And if, after that effort, still will be some difficulties here and there to relate to my ideas, then you can answer to it – if you wish – in accord to certain parts of it, one part at a time. I only want to help, for you to enjoy more my comments – or not, hehe.
Regards.
October 29, 2013 at 10:14 PM
Touche….
October 29, 2013 at 10:19 PM
Sounds like you and Joe have the inside track as to what’s going on. Or maybe you don’t….
October 29, 2013 at 10:22 PM
Now that is undeniably true. Maybe we do or maybe we don’t.
October 29, 2013 at 10:26 PM
Good enough for me..
October 29, 2013 at 10:35 PM
Pretty proud of you comments eh Luis…
October 29, 2013 at 10:56 PM
Really thx, John.
October 29, 2013 at 9:36 PM
Just saying thats what the Palistinians have promise to do and are trying to do. But again just we seems to be.
October 29, 2013 at 10:15 PM
Its not the palestinians that we are talking about here. Its Iran, Israel, USA…Remember? Just try to keep yourself focused, John,
and, please, read my previous comment. Deaf dialogue, remember? We don’t want such a thing, do we?
October 29, 2013 at 11:30 PM
Deaf what? I can’t hear you! Oh, you’re be condescending. Ha Ha
Why am I not surprised. Ha Ha He He