US general says Syria action could be ‘more substantial than thought’ – Telegraph

US general says Syria action could be ‘more substantial than thought’ – Telegraph.

A former US army chief has claimed that Barack Obama is eyeing intervention in Syria that would go beyond a mere deterrent against chemical weapons to damage the military capacity of the Assad regime.

 

A former US army chief has claimed that Barack Obama is eyeing intervention in Syria that would go beyond a mere deterrent against chemical weapons to damage the military capacity of the Assad regime.

Bashar al-Assad and Barack Obama Photo: EPA

General Jack Keane, a former vice chief of staff of the US Army, told BBC Radio 4 that he had spoken to senior Republican senators who had been briefed by the US president on Monday, and had been assured that Mr Obama planned to do significant damage to the forces of Bashar al-Assad.

The Obama administration has previously said that military strikes would not be aimed at toppling Assad’s government nor altering the balance of the conflict. Instead, the White House has suggested, they would be intended to punish Assad for the alleged gas attack in Damascus on Aug 21 and to reinstate Washington’s “red line” against the use of chemical weapons.

But Gen. Keane said he understood Mr Obama was planning a more substantial intervention in Syria than had previously been thought, with increased support for the opposition forces, including training from US troops.

He said the plans could involve “much more substance than we were led to believe”.

After speaking to Republican senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, who attended the briefing with Mr Obama, Gen. Keane said: “What he won’t do is topple the regime. There’s a distinction here.

“What he has told the two senators is that he also intends to assist the opposition forces, so he is going to degrade Assad’s military capacity and he is going to assist and upgrade the opposition forces with training assistance.”

Gen. Keane said any training would probably be done in neighbouring Jordan rather than in Syria itself.

The US general, who retired in 2003, attributed Mr Obama’s surprise decision to seek congressional support for intervention to David Cameron’s “humiliating defeat” in the Commons.

He said the US would “much rather” have British backing for any strikes against Bashar Assad’s regime.

Gen. Keane explained: “We operate side by side with the UK and we know who our closest ally is. We certainly would much rather do this with the UK side by side, that’s how the military feels, I really think the leaders of the country feel.

“I think, if I may use some rich language here, the humiliating defeat the Prime Minister suffered in Parliament, I can only surmise was stunning to the President and I think it impacted on him.

“I think that’s one of the motivations that introduced what I call palpable fear and one of the reasons why he is seeking political cover himself.”

Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

5 Comments on “US general says Syria action could be ‘more substantial than thought’ – Telegraph”

  1. Kayvan's avatar Kayvan Says:

    The attack on Syria might be bigger than what is reflected in media reports. Chemical weapons can not be neutralized by just air and missile power , because the unintended consequences will be catastrophic, due to the volatile nature of the chemical weapons.
    There may be boots on the ground in the form of special forces to secure the stock piles.

    • mad muller's avatar mad muller Says:

      There will be no boots on the ground,this is not to help israel it is for nato interests,Israel needs to do its own dirty work by itself

    • Momus's avatar Momus Says:

      I think boots on the ground are highly likely if an operation occurs, and the major reason Obama is going to Congress.
      Isn’t the neutralizing of chemical weapons the eventuality that the forces in Jordan we have heard about are training for?

  2. John Prophet's avatar John Prophet Says:

    It is long past time for Israel to more than just subtifug! Its own survival is at stake. Elimination of Hezbollah and Hamas should be Israels minimum goal. Take out Irans pincer armies.

  3. caliz in miami,fl's avatar caliz in miami,fl Says:

    The chemical weapons will be removed by the Russians to Iran.That is the deal in exchange for not attacking Syria.The weapons then cannot be used by the Syrian government on the population and they will be put of the reach of the al qaeda jihadists that are currently fighting the Syrian government.


Leave a reply to caliz in miami,fl Cancel reply