Obama: US not backing any Egyptian party or group
Obama: US not backing any Egyptian party or group | The Times of Israel.
( Whether true or not, does anybody believe anything coming out of the Obama administration anymore? – JW )
White House statement rejects ‘false claims’ to the contrary, reiterates commitment to democracy and demands an end to violence
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama on Saturday reiterated that the US is not aligned with and is not supporting any particular Egyptian political party or group and again condemned the ongoing violence across Egypt.
Obama made those points during a telephone conference with the National Security Council about developments in Egypt, according to a statement issued by the White House. He was spending the weekend at Camp David, the presidential retreat in Maryland.
“The United States categorically rejects the false claims propagated by some in Egypt that we are working with specific political parties or movements to dictate how Egypt’s transition should proceed,” the White House statement said. “We remain committed to the Egyptian people and their aspirations for democracy, economy opportunity and dignity. But the future path of Egypt can only be determined by the Egyptian people.”
The White House statement repeated key assertions Obama and other US officials have made since the Egyptian military ousted the democratically elected president of Egypt, calling for an inclusive process allowing for all groups and parties to participate, urging all Egyptian leaders to condemn the use of force and to prevent further violence, and urging demonstrators to conduct themselves peacefully.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel spoke again Saturday to Egypt’s defense minister, emphasizing the need for a peaceful civilian transition in Egypt and noting “the importance of security for the Egyptian people, Egypt’s neighbors and the region,” the Defense Department said in a statement.
Hagel also spoke to Crown Prince bin Zayed of the United Arab Emirates on Saturday to discuss Egypt and “matters of mutual security concern in the Middle East,” Pentagon press secretary George Little said in the statement.
Secretary of State John Kerry has been in touch hourly with the US ambassador to Egypt, Anne W. Patterson, and has spoken in the last two days to officials in the region, the State Department said in a statement.
“Secretary Kerry also reaffirmed US support for democracy and the protection of universal human rights for all Egyptians, reform that meets the legitimate aspirations of the people, and respect for the rule of law,” according to the statement. “He stressed that the United States wants to see Egypt’s civilian transition succeed, and that the United States will do all it can to help encourage that effort.”
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.
Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized
WarSclerotic 
July 7, 2013 at 2:08 PM
Anyone with an IQ above room tempature knows that this statement from Obama, like most of his other statements, is pure bovine fecial matter. Whether it’s been in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, or Syria, Obama’s policy has ALWAYS been to support the Mo Bros, whatever the cost; it’s been the one constant feature of his Middle East policy.
July 7, 2013 at 3:21 PM
The whole ¨man ¨is a fake, a created fake , educated and groomed to fulfill his task.
He is something from a bad horror movie whiteout a harpy ending.
I strongly believe that if they do not get rid of them very soon, the world will be changed so much that we wake up in a morning in a brave new world ( Aldous Huxley )
Ships the name Huxley, o yea there we have Julian Huxley the brother.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/world-evolutionary-humanism-eugenics-and-unesco/9477
Trans humanism but not all animals are equal
Lets create a new world order..
July 7, 2013 at 3:40 PM
O i forgot the connection, simple
the UN !
The spirituality of the UN
Nothing new here, but just other words and tactics !
connect the dots whit lines and so you get a picture.
July 7, 2013 at 3:51 PM
Oke , oke , start here, to investigate
http://www.green-agenda.com/globalgovernance.html
July 7, 2013 at 4:12 PM
Obama frowns on Egyptian army’s alignment with Gulf regimes, coming crackdown on Muslim Brotherhood
http://www.debka.com/article/23101/Obama-frowns-on-Egyptian-army%E2%80%99s-alignment-with-Gulf-regimes-coming-crackdown-on-Muslim-Brotherhood-
July 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM
Joop, I don’t understand you.
What is so bad about the New World Order?
July 7, 2013 at 5:02 PM
That depend completely where you stand in live.
For one it will be heaven on earth and for an other one it will be a hell on earth.
Let me try to explain it very short.
There are 2 ways for the future of the world
1) A technocratic controlled fascistic world order which controls every part of live, forced upon the people by force or crisis.
2) Just the natural way of the right of the strongest, ( not only physical force )
In system one there will be a lot of violence and the outcome will not be a part of our meme because it is forced upon us.and we end up in a social jail whit total government control.no more individual derisions and freedom and no responsibility no private property, for some a heaven an for some a hell
In system 2 we will have also a lot of violence but after a wile we will see that we have to change our habits trough practical experiences of the senses , that will be become a part of our meme and will be adapted freely, so we end not up in a social jail but in a free world.whit individual freedom and responsibility, no burden because it will be a part of the meme.
We as humankind are on a cross road and i fear that as we chose option one, we will have in time a world wide uproar again, because the human mind and spirit is not jail able for a long time.
We have to recognize that humans develop in different speeds.
and it is not possible to forged them in to a standardized production , polluting unit.
I know it is short a way to short, but i can not explain 35 year thinking and gathering info in a a4 sheet. simply i do not have that skill .
I,am technical educated and my whole live working whit control processes.
And i can tell you my perception of humankind is drastically changed the last 15 years.
You understand now that i,am for the natural way.
Better to fight and live and die as a free human being than living as a enslaved production , polluting unit.
But to be honest, i,am at a age that i,am more a traveler in a train sitting for a window who looks very interested to the passing by political landscape.
What ever happens is oke for me, it will be the wisdom or stupidity of human kind and i can noting do about it other than give some info.
Furthermore i see whatever happens as a step in the evolution of mankind, but i hope we will pas for the step of enslavement..
But in the end we will arrive as humankind on an end station of knowing, not in mine live time, but this is my believe and hope for humankind.
Whit regards
Joop.
July 7, 2013 at 8:40 PM
I asked you because a while ago you said that “Evil is in the eye of the beholder”.
We had a discussion whether objective morality exists or not.
You said then that objective morality as I understand it does not exist.
Well, if you are consistent you have to admit that what the NWO is planning is not really morally wrong or evil because from their point of view they are doing what is good for the planet and for humanity.
If you are consistent in your view then there is the possibility that what the NWO plans is really morally right and good for humanity.
In truth there is no difference between option 1 and 2.
Even the NWO is subject to evolution and thus their way is also the natural way.
It is only we humans who make an arbitrary distiction between natural and unnatural.
This distinction is a false one because anything and everything that exists in the physical universe is a part of nature.
For example in Oklo Africa there were the remains of something discovered which scientist believe to be a natural nuclear reactor.
Click to access 17505004447.pdf
Evolution does not say anything about right or wrong.
Whoever or whatever survives is right.
I admire your belief that a better world is possible and I think that you are honest in your desire for the evolution of humanity into something better.
Although you don’t state it explicitly this implies that you yourself deep down believe in something that is objectively morally right.
You didn’t talk about morality but any statement about how humans should or should not behave IS a statement about morality.
The idea that man evolves into something that is morally better has been shown by history to be false.
The human heart has not changed over time. The human heart is not only good but also evil.
This is the reason why all attempts to create an utopia on this earth have failed and this is the reason why democracy with strong checks and balances is the best form of goverment.
Evolution does not necessarily lead to a morally better society.
Why should we oppose the NWO?
If we apply your view consistently then there is aside from the the fact that we don’t like being enslaved no reason to oppose the NWO if what they are doing is morally the right thing.
Now, you may say that not wanting to be enslaved is reason enough.
That is a valid point but throughout history there were always people who did what they thought was morally right regardless of the consequences for themselves.
Moreover if the NWO is so powerful as you seem to believe then it is inevitable that many of those who oppose it are going to die if they fight against it.
The question these people will ask themselves is: Is it worth dying for?
This question is a hard one but there are still many of us who prefer death to slavery.
Nevertheless there are those who are not part of the NWO but would come on top in your brave new world.
Why should they oppose the NWO if they would end up being amomgst the masters?
Sincirely
Artaxes
July 7, 2013 at 4:19 PM
Lets see, the un will warn to protect the mo bro,s and obamadrama send assistance whit the eu and whit nato agreement. !
Somebody is not following the plan, has to be corrected.
Far fetched ?
July 7, 2013 at 7:40 PM
Well said, Joop; like George Orwell said, “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face…forever.”
July 7, 2013 at 8:53 PM
Nice to see some here are awake 🙂
July 7, 2013 at 9:55 PM
Nope artaxes ( thanks for your extensive comment )
You ask me, why and i started whit :
That depend completely where you stand in live.
For one it will be heaven on earth and for an other one it will be a hell on earth.
Nothing universal, just individual .
I did not argue about the end station but about the road we take to reach the end station, and the nwo way is as explained not my cookie. ( individual opinion nothing universal )
And i stated :
What ever happens is oke for me, it will be the wisdom or stupidity of human kind and i can noting do about it other than give some info.
You see an opportunistic approach without to be an on topper , just pragmatic realizing that I can not fight against stupidity and the name of the game is for me surviving till my time is over.
I do not believe in suicide as a solution perhaps as an escape, but i,am happy to be a traveler.
mm, maybe you can make from surviving an universal morality, nah wont work , suicide bombers and more of that weird shit.
But as you perhaps remember i stated that there was no universal morality yet, but perhaps in time.
Can you see my end station as an universal morality complete embedded in the meme of human kind.?
Will it be our final destination to know it by nature.the last step to the perfect being in complete harmony whit the universe ( s)
July 10, 2013 at 6:29 AM
You still don’t understand what objective morality means.
Even if ALL people on this planet would agree that albinos should be aborted that would stil be morally wrong.
“mm, maybe you can make from surviving an universal morality, nah wont work , suicide bombers and more of that weird shit.”
Thanks, you are proving exactly my point that no morality can be derived from evolution and therefore fascism is neither more nor less unnatural than any other political system.
My source of morality is not evolution.
As demonstrated your solution 1 und 2 are in essence the same: the law of the jungle. Solution 2 will quickly lead to solution 1.
I prefer solution 3: The rule of law.
As for your endstation, how the hell do you even know that there is an endstation? Evolution has no endstation, just constant change.
Based on your own world view you cannot oppose the NWO on moral grounds but you can only say: “It is just my opinion.”.
In other words, it is only your personal preference like chocolate or vanilla.
Why should anyone care about your personal preferences?
I don’t care about personal preferences. I’m only interested in the truth.
Maybe the rest of the world is not stupid. Maybe you just don’t make a good case to convince them. Ever thought about that?
The biggest irony is this:
As this video demonstrates the forces that you call the NWO are the ones who promote moral relativism and attack traditional morality.
The first 100 minutes show how deep this goes.
Warning: You may feel sick after watching the video.
The Kinsey Syndrome
July 7, 2013 at 10:23 PM
Forgot something.
In the way of the nwo there are no longer independent free democratic states anymore,.
So Israel is going up in the nwo and loosing here Jewish identity.?
I see a problem on the horizon rising here !
Or seeing we already the beginning of the fall of Israel ??
Well are the actions from the eu obamadrama just incompetence or is there an other agenda ?
The usa is already gone whit the second term of obamadrama, it takes just a bit more time to realize that.
Let me make a joke
In 10 years the fema camps are liberated by the chines.
July 7, 2013 at 11:53 PM
Joop are you familiar with Albert Pike?
July 8, 2013 at 12:51 AM
Not special but i found this
.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike.htm
one of the dots
Do some research about the lucis ( lucifer ) trust a NGO of the un.
(Alice Ann Bailey)
A must read whit links
bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_lucytrust04.htm
similar , similar
Oeps memory is kicking in, yep i read something long ago about him.
Alice Ann Bailey 32 grade free mason
Albert Pike 32 grade free mason.
What a coincidence !!