In a meeting with a group of Arab Americans this week, U.S. President Barack Obama revealed that he will not push the Israelis and Palestinians toward restarting negotiations or outline a new peace initiative during his upcoming visit to the region, but he will take with him a cash infusion of $500 million – which Congress will soon release – of much needed financial aid to the Palestinian Authority.
Obama met at the White House with members from the Arab American Anti-Discrimination Committee, the Arab American Institute, the Arab Federation of Ramallah, the American Task Force for Palestine and other individuals and groups.
“Obama said that since the Israeli government has not been willing to make concessions, there is no point in pushing [for negotiations] right now,” one participant at the meeting with Obama said on condition of anonymity.
“He said the goal of his trip was to speak to the Israeli people directly,” said another participant. “He thinks it was a mistake that he didn’t address the Israeli public in his first term.”
Obama’s planned speech to the Israeli public, which has yet to announced, will be complementary of Jewish and Israeli history and accomplishments and Israelis’ hopes of maintaining a democratic Jewish state, said three participants who were at the meeting.
“He said he wanted to see what kind of concessions the Israelis are willing to make and push them in that direction, that’s why he wants to give the speech to the Israeli people,” said one source.
But Obama warned that the speech to the Israeli public might not have what the Arab participants in the meeting were looking for. “But he implored us to give them a pass on this one,” the source said. (Emphasis mine.)
Obama told the group he will speak to Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas separately during his planned visit to Ramallah.
Obama wants his plans to include another West Bank stop, though what he will do is still unclear. “He said ‘I don’t want the trip to be a drive by,’” according to a participant “but they haven’t figured out how to do it yet.”
Obama will also tell the Palestinians that “going the way of the United Nations is not the right way. The right way is negotiations,” according to a source.
Obama also expressed his frustrations with the lack of progress on the negotiations. “He was highly engaged but realistic. He understands the community was frustrated; he said he was very frustrated. ‘The only people more frustrated than me,’ Obama said, were the ‘Palestinians living in West Bank and Gaza – it’s a legitimate frustration,’” the source quoted Obama as saying.
One of the participants also said that Obama expressed his frustration with Congress. “Every time the pressure gets to the Israelis they go to Congress,” said the source. “He wants to find a way around that, that’s why he wants to talk to the Israeli public directly.” (Emphasis mine.)
Neither the Iranian nuclear issue nor the settlements came up in the meeting, according to the sources who attended. The nuclear issue, however, did come up in Obama’s meetings with Jewish leaders, with whom he met the previous week.
On Jordan, Obama told the participants he will urge the government to continue the democratizations process. “He said Jordan was an example of a monarchy trying to find a way to open up without chaos and that’s something they want to support,” a person who took part in the meeting said. “The president also said if Syrian President Basher al-Assad is willing to negotiate they should, but it doesn’t seem like he’s willing to and the window is closing.”
Obama had a last message to the participants. “He said ‘this trip is not going to give you everything you want’,” a source said.
March 12, 2013 at 9:37 AM
It’s called Taqiyya (تقي)
March 12, 2013 at 12:01 PM
We know Obama, no surprises in his store for us; he will tell everybody what he thinks the people will like to hear, he will lie to the jews, he will lie to the arabs, he is lying now to the Christians. This man has no God, he has no religion but love of himself. Many thought he might be a muslim, but he is not. He will lie and sell Israel to its enemies and he will do this in the most natural way from his point of view. He is a deceiver. He is the real antichrist.
March 12, 2013 at 4:41 PM
Thats right everyone who has had dealings with Obama says he is only out for himself,Alarabiya is in the dark even more so,i prefer to wait and see,as were speculating on the unknown at the moment ther are hundreds of conflicting story’s,i doubt any f them are true,as for an arabs rambling i would just laff it off its in there interests to make us hate obama,the biggest lies i have ever read came from this website,obama will pay politically if he is lieing,the militia movement in America is really turning on him i would be worried if i was the president,
March 12, 2013 at 8:40 PM
War soon.
March 13, 2013 at 1:25 AM
Soon i think we blinked at the start,we were all looking the wrong way,been wondering where you had been,for the lat month lol
March 13, 2013 at 1:53 AM
Theres a US amphibious strike group on the the way now,the 26th M E U ,is expected the next few days
March 13, 2013 at 1:09 AM
Militia movement in America? Obama out for himself? Speculation, or wishful thinking? Why not look beyond these confining walls and come up with the specifics on the purported boom-booms at Fordow . . . or does Fordow now relegated to the ‘never mind’ category?
Oy, things get curiouser and curiouser.
March 13, 2013 at 8:32 AM
Yip, I have been wondering about this ‘leaks’ of what ‘happened’ at Fordow ….. that Fordow is now in the ‘never mind’ category has been niggling at me too…. how much explosives would one need to smuggle in…..and never mind that, how does one connect all that (pieces of) explosives together and detonate it together and at the right time?…. seems to me like that would be an even bigger feat than bombing it with bunker busters ….. but…maybe it is true though, because where before bombing Iran were said not to be possible for Israel to do a complete job without US support, now is being reported as “a one night operation” ….Would taking Fordow out of the equation really relegate it now to a ‘one night operation’ ….. I do not know enough to answer that.
March 13, 2013 at 10:32 AM
If – and this is a very big ”if” – Fordow is not a problem anymore, then the rest of the Iranian nuclear facilities are not much of a problem for the Israeli air force, the missile option included. And yes, it will take one night to do the job. Or a whole afternoon, it depends. Iran is not worrying me anymore.
March 13, 2013 at 7:47 PM
What does Fordow have to do with the article?
No one mentioned it.
Do you love strawmen?
But if you really are interested what we think about Fordow, I simply paste a comment I’ve made on March 1.
There is a lot more to say about it but that’s enough for a start.
Since you asked us about our feelings …
I feel pessimistic about the outcome of the negotiations.
Nuclear deals with Iran are as elusive as the famous ‘red lines’.
Based on what has been going on for a decade I see no good reason to be optimistic.
Based on the players involved I see no good reason to think that even if they strike a deal it will be in the best interests of Israel or the real interests of the US and Europe (not talking about the traitors in our elites).
How I’d love to be proven wrong …
Why should the Iranians agree?
As I see it, they won’t give up their goal of getting nukes. Only a temporary slowdown or a deal which leaves so much loopholes that they can continue their nuke development quietly is acceptable for them.
Unless the negotiators speak softly in public to allow the Iranians to safe face but carry a big stick in the meetings I see no reason to be optimistic.
This stick does not necessarily has to be the threat of direct and open military attack but anything else that is a credible threat to the survival of the mullah regime or to the existence of their nuclear program.
I don’t believe that US and Europe carry this kind of stick.
Anyway. What is different this time?
The West is willing to offer the Iranians a little more than before.
There is another one carrying a stick and that is Israel.
Netanyahu has set a clear red line which will be crossed this year if everything stays the same.
The Iranians know, that he will be under immense pressure to act either overtly or covertly.
Whether the explosion in Fordow happened or not does not change that pressure.
Only if the explosion is publicly confirmed then can Netanyahu justify to wait a little bit longer.
And so the demand to shut down or suspend operation in Fordow offers the Iranians a convenient exit.
If that explosion in Fordow did really happen it would be bad for the Iranians to admit it because it would put pressure on them to retaliate.
Why Fordow?
Other than that is buried deeper underground there is no difference between Fordow and the enrichment plant at Natanz.
ISIS has done an analysis based on the latest IAEA-report.
This analysis shows that from Feb. 2012 to Feb. 2013 the number of centrifges which were operating remained constant (about 700 centrifuges).
Up to now none of the newly installed centrifuges has been operating.
The total number of centrifuges is about 2700.
According to the analysis 15 of the 16 new cascades have been vacuum tested and are likely ready to enrich Uranium soon.
The important thing to consider is, that according to the IAEA all centrifuges installed at Fordow are IR-1 centrifuges.
These first generation centrifuges are enriching much slower than the newer IR-2 centrifuges that Iran wants to install at Natanz.
The question then is, why is the West demanding specifically the halt of operations at Fordow when these centrifuges are the same as the ones in Natanz and the IAEA has the same access to both sites?
Why not demanding a general reduction of enrichment?
Answer: It takes the pressure off from Netanyahu while it takes away from the Iranians the need to retaliate and it is easy to accept because the whole damned is blown up anyway.
Am I absolutely 100% sure? Hell no, but the latest IAEA-report did not mention any inspections after 21. Jan. 2013.
And so, while I am pessimistic about the final outcome of the negotiations, I am cautiously optimistic, that Iran agrees to suspend enrichment at Fordow as a sign of good will and a first step.
They are not going to stop their nuclear program but it will buy time for all players. And what better way is there for Obavez to enter Jerusalem as the Second Coming on Nssan 9?
Click to access ISIS_Analysis_IAEA_safeguards_Report_21Feb2013.pdf
As I said at the beginning of this year. 2013 will be the year of decision.
So at the end of 2013 one of the following will have happened:
a) Iran and the West strike a deal (not necessarily a final one) that makes an attack at least this year unnecessary.
b) We hear of ‘mysterious accidents’ that slow the Iranian program further down.
c) The Israeli goverment gives a plausible explanation why the Iranian nuclear program is
not as advanced as prevously thought and why there is still time so that an attack is not
necessary. This could be a result of unconfirmed ‘mysterious accidents’.
d) The US or Israel attack Iran.
e) The Iranians are enriching like crazy and they have enough material to build a nuke.
f) Nothing. Everything stays the same. Except that the Iranians have now enough material for a nuke.