The US Grows Two Big Ones – FWIW

The US Grows Two Big Ones – FWIW – YouTube.

The destruction of Fordow has enabled the US to do a 180 on its policy visa vie Iran and Israel.  Obama gave Israel the green light not only for the strike that happened, but for any other strike Israel deems necessary.

Bottom line.  A war is no longer necessary to stop Iran’s quest for the bomb. –  JW

Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

11 Comments on “The US Grows Two Big Ones – FWIW”

  1. Luis's avatar Luis Says:

    There is only one question which deeply trouble us : the event in Fordow really happened?If yes, then no comments are necessary; if not, then…is simply not good. The difficulty here is in bringing the proof when the explosion ocured deeply underground and no one has any posibility to approach and ”taking pictures” from there,

    ”Only time will tell”…

    • Joseph Wouk's avatar josephwouk Says:

      Just look at the changes in all the parties’ policies since the “non event.”

      Then tell me what could have possibly motivated them other than what I laid out.

      I’m more than open to hearing another analysis. Till now, I’ve heard none from anywhere….


  2. Hi

    I think you are right in your analysis Joseph. From now on we will see Israel’s enemies melting away like the snow in springtime. By fall we will see very dramatic changes in Iran. Iran will become the first Islamic nation becoming a Christian nation, but not the last. Egypt and Saudibarbaria will follow after lots of suffering. (Syria on the other hand will be utterly destroyed by the islamists themselves)

    And history will recognise the fall of Fordow was the turning point.

    BR

    Peter


  3. I think you are somewhat too optimistic in your assessment.
    I agree that the explosion at Fordo did happen . Reza Kahlili is a reliable source. The IAEA backtracked after it had first supported IRAN’s claim that there was no explosion.
    http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/u-n-wont-deny-explosions-at-iran-nuke-plant/

    quote
    However, in a follow-up inquiry by WND to verify if the IAEA had inspected the site since the report of the explosions, Tudor refused to answer.
    “I’m very sorry but I can’t go into any further details on ongoing safeguards work, which is conducted with a high level of confidentiality,” she replied.
    end quote

    But why do you believe that the Twelvers, who according to the apocalyptic Hadith, are willing to sacrifice 2/3 of the human race to bring back the Mahdi have all of a sudden given up?
    http://www.jpost.com/Magazine/Opinion/Article.aspx?id=244996

    quote
    Iran is led by a group of irrational men who believe they can hurry the arrival of the Mahdi – the 12th Imam who, according to Shi’ite Islamic tradition, went missing in 874 CE and will return under conditions ofglobal chaos. The Iranian leadership appears willing to sacrifice the population of its own country to achieve this goal. In his book The Rise of Nuclear Iran, former Israeli ambassador to the UN Dore Gold writes, “Mahdi Khaliji, an Iranian Shi’ite scholar… has noted that there are apocalyptic hadiths [received Shi’ite traditions] that the Mahdi will not return unless one-third of the world population is killed and another third die.
    end quote

    Biden wants to talk to the Iranians when they become serious. But can they ever become serious? Do we really expect these people to abandon their core beliefs because of the Fordo setback?

    Surely scholars of Islam like Bernard Lewis and Raphael Israeli or scholar of anti-Semitism like Matthias Kuntzel and former CIA spy Reza Kalili know more about the mindset of the Twelvers and Mullahs than most of the analysts in the West.

    With all the info Israel and the US must have obtained from stuxnet, duqu, flame, the mahdi and other worms I am sure that they have a fairly good idea where Iran is at the moment. Stuxnet may probably be compared to the Ultra project under Alan Turing during WWII when the Brits at Bletchley Park broke the German Enigma code and significantly helped in the war effort .

    But despite all these victories I am not sure we are out of the woods yet, not when you are dealing with an enemy who cannot be deterred, i.e. to whom, according Bernard Lewis, M.A.D. is not a constraint; it is an inducement…

    Why are Bernard Lewis’s views on MAD ignored?
    http://www.madisdead.blogspot.co.il/2012/05/why-are-bernard-lewiss-views-on-mad.html

    P.S . Yesterday I came across this. I am putting this here since I do not know how to pass this info to you. I do not have your email

    How This Magazine Wronged Herman Wouk
    http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/how-this-magazine-wronged-herman-wouk/

  4. John Chambers's avatar John Chambers Says:

    Joseph, Fordo attack story was cover for Syrian convoy bombing.

  5. Luis's avatar Luis Says:

    For Artaxes: Very good question, indeed. I think they would react like they are reacting now and that is ”no reaction”. Not yes and not no. But, its very difficult to understand something from nothing.

  6. Louisiana Steve's avatar Louisiana Steve Says:

    Best damn explanation I’ve seen so far, JW.

  7. John Prophet's avatar John Prophet Says:

    Evil’s intent is clear and it’s tentacles run deep and far. Dealing with it years ago was the smart move. As with WWII those who oppose evil have waited too long. This time evil will have atomics!


Leave a reply to Luis Cancel reply