White House opposed new Iran sanctions | Foreign Policy

White House opposed new Iran sanctions | The Cable.

( And I was beginning to think that BHO was finally coming around… – JW )

The White House announced its opposition to a new round of Iran sanctions that the Senate unanimously approved Friday, in the latest instance of Congress pushing for more aggressive punitive measures on Iran than the administration deems prudent.

On Thursday, Sens. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and Mark Kirk (R-IL) introduced the amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, which the Senate passed 94-0. The new legislative language would blacklist Iran’s energy, port, shipping, and shipbuilding sectors, while also placing new restrictions on Iran’s ability to get insurance for all these industries. The legislation would also vastly expand U.S. support for human rights inside Iran and impose new sanctions on Iranians who divert humanitarian assistance from its intended purpose.

“The window is closing. The time for the waiting game is over,” Menendez said on the Senate floor Thursday night. “Yes, our sanctions are having a demonstrable effect on the Iranian economy, but Iran is still working just as hard to develop nuclear weapons.”

But the White House told several Senate offices Thursday evening that the administration was opposed to the amendment. National Security Spokesman Tommy Vietor sent The Cable the administration’s official position, explaining the White House’s view the sanctions aren’t needed and aren’t helpful at this time.

“As we focus with our partners on effectively implementing these efforts, we believe additional authorities now threaten to undercut these efforts,” he said. “We also have concerns with some of the formulations as currently drafted in the text and want to work through them with our congressional partners to make the law more effective and consistent with the current sanctions law to ensure we don’t undercut our success to date.”

An e-mail from the NSC’s legislative affairs office to some Senate Democrats late Thursday evening, obtained by The Cable, went into extensive detail about the administration’s concerns about the new sanctions legislation, including that it might get in the way of the administration’s efforts to implement the last round of Iran sanctions, the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act (TRA), to which it flatly objected at the time.

“We do not believe additional authority to apply more sanctions on Iran is necessary at this time,” read the e-mail, which the NSC legislative affairs office said represented the entire administration’s view. “At the same time, we are concerned that this amendment is duplicative and threatens to confuse and undermine some of the TRA provisions.”

One of the White House’s chief concerns is that Congress is not providing the administration enough waivers, which would give the United States the option of negating or postponing applications of the sanctions on a case-by-case basis.

The White House also said that secondary sanctions should apply only to those Iranian persons and entities that are guilty of aiding Iran’s nulear and missile programs. The new legislative language would designate entire categories of Iranian government entities to be sanctioned — whether or not each person or entity is directly involved in such activities.

The new sanctions too broadly punish companies that supply materials, such as certain metals, that could be used in Iran’s nuclear, military, or ballistic missile programs, the White House worries. The bill allows those materials to be sold to Iranian entities that intend to use them for non-military or nuclear-related purposes, but the administration said that the ambiguity in that part of the legislation will make it hard to implement.

Finally, the White House doesn’t want to implement the part of the new legislation that would require reports to Congress on the thousands of boats that dock at Iranian ports and the dozens of Iranian planes that make stops at airports around the world. Those reporting requirements “will impose serious time burdens on the Intelligence Community and sanctions officers,” the White House said in the e-mail.

The Obama administration often touts the Iran sanctions it once opposed. In the final presidential debate Oct. 22, President Barack Obama said his administration had “organized the strongest coalition and the strongest sanctions against Iran in history, and it is crippling their economy.”

The new Iran sanctions still must survive a House-Senate conference over the defense authorization bill, during which conferees may try to change certain portions of the new sanctions regime. Hill aides predict the White House will try to alter the new sanctions during that process, in what they would likely see as an effort to water them down.

“The truth is that the U.S. Congress continues to lead a comprehensive and unrelenting international sanctions program against the Iranian regime despite a comprehensive and unrelenting campaign by this administration to block or water down those sanctions at every move,” a senior GOP Senate aide told The Cable. “We beat them 100-0 last year and while they tried to kill this amendment more quietly this time, we beat them again 94-0. Hopefully House and Senate negotiators will stay strong and resist the administration’s strategy to dilute these sanctions in conference.”

Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

14 Comments on “White House opposed new Iran sanctions | Foreign Policy”

  1. Luis's avatar Luis Says:

    In this stage, it doesn’t really mater what sanctions will or will not be imposed on Iran. After the Fordo nuclear facility suddenly collapse-in one certain day- the iranian atomic program will be disrupted.

  2. Joseph Wouk's avatar josephwouk Says:

    Luis…

    If there’s one thing I’ve learned after 35 years in the middle east it’s to recognize and discount anything that even remotely resembles “wishful thinking.”

    If you are not guilty of this in your above comment, please expound and make us all feel a little better.

    • Luis's avatar Luis Says:

      Wishful thinking would be the scenario in which an all out attack will occur on Iran and, to be sincere, I don’t think that such an option is on the cards(israeli cards).

      But, a mysterious and clean undetectable attack on Fordo which will end in a huge explosion, this is something very plausible.

      I will be surprised if such an event wont occur.

  3. Thunderbunny's avatar Thunderbunny Says:

    Are you going to shave your head if you’re wrong?

    • Luis's avatar Luis Says:

      Hi, Thunderbunny. Remember last time ? I was wrong only by one day, but my beard was gone. Never mind about that, because my wife was happy with that. Now, lets get serious.
      I bet than because I was 100 percent sure IDF will act. The same here, but I cannot say who will do that. The principal is, Fordo facility will be buried in the mountain. There is no importance in who or what will do that.

  4. Justice for israel's avatar Justice for israel Says:

    Out of context but this is really significant,what it means i dont know,connect the dots…http://www.examiner.com/article/russia-to-deploy-combat-troops-near-norway

    • Luis's avatar Luis Says:

      This is a Putin Chess move, which means tactical distraction and an effective treat against the american radar bases in Norway.
      And, of course, Putin knows one or two things we don’t know right now.

      • Joseph Wouk's avatar josephwouk Says:

        Luis…

        I agree that Frodo must go. As well as the other semi “secret” sites that are now coming to light.

        I disagree though, that that’s enough.

        Radical Islam must be stopped NOW!

        Iran is the core of this vile ideology that threatens the 2st century. The regime must be DESTROYED!

        In my mind, there is no significant difference between a radical Islam regime, a communist regime or a fascist one. They are all violent, totalitarian threats.

        Remember how we dealt with totalitarianism in WW II?

        “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER !”

        It’s time the West stopped whining and making excuses in the hope that this approaching evil will somehow go away by itself.

        It won’t.

        We have to bite the bullet and do what our fathers did before us.

        We have much greater strength than they did. What we lack is the will and the insight to act on the clear facts before out eyes.

      • Justice for israel's avatar Justice for israel Says:

        Its aimed at the uk,norways not that important,its a tactical miscalculation,they may well end up losing there forces and navy,russia is no match for the uk

  5. Luis's avatar Luis Says:

    The History, sometimes, follows a strange path and the people must first see and suffer the horror for the strong action to be taken. On a tactical scale, the implosion in that facility will be on such a manner, that nobody will be able to point to any tracks in the aftermath. And its better that way because we don’t want to trigger a large scale conflict when the USA is in such a lamentable situation. Meantime, the events in Syria have a life of their own and this war will continue to keep busy all the parts involved and may be we’ll see new players joining openly to the party.

    To be finished, the radical islam must first climb higher and higher for the fall to be crushing and decisive; its a pity, however, that in the process millions will perish. Its like we learn History every time from scratch.

    • Joseph Wouk's avatar josephwouk Says:

      Millions need not die. All it takes is someone in the West to act on what they know to be true. That’s a LOT of people.

      Radical Islam survives and even thrives on the willful disregard of what they themselves claim to be their raison d’etre.

      We need to scream the truth from the rooftops. Our governments need to hear us and act.

      If they don’t, we have to put in new governments, before it’s too late.

  6. Thunderbunny's avatar Thunderbunny Says:

    You can be sure that no action will be taken against Iran by military means- at least by the Americans. Obama will do nothing.

    • Louisiana Steve's avatar Louisiana Steve Says:

      Absolutely correct…unless the Iranians make a huge mistake by attacking a U.S. military asset. If that happens, the U.S. military will not be obligated to call Obama for permission to retaliate. A defensive move by it’s very nature must be immediate and intense enough to neutralize the threat. Anything beyond that will require a phone call to Obama and would be viewed as offensive. Once Obama weighs in, all bets are off.

      • Thunderbunny's avatar Thunderbunny Says:

        A US ‘asset’ was attacked in Libya and NOTHING was done. A dead ambassador would have normally been regarded as an act of war.

        No. We haven’t seen just how bad Obama is just yet. He is Jimmy Carter on steroids. Chamberlain on crack.

        Carter once said that he wouldn’t have retaliated against the Soviet Union in a nuclear war. Obama shares the same opinion x2.


Leave a reply to Louisiana Steve Cancel reply