49%-51%: Germany, Russia, UK disagree on odds of Syrian ceasefire holding

49%-51%: Germany, Russia, UK disagree on odds of Syrian ceasefire holding

Published time: 13 Feb, 2016 14:51

Source: 49%-51%: Germany, Russia, UK disagree on odds of Syrian ceasefire holding — RT News

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov (L) speaks to German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier at the Munich Security Conference in Munich, Germany, February 13, 2016. © Michael Dalder

 

The foreign ministers of Germany, Russia and the UK attending a security conference in Munich gave conflicting views on how likely the negotiated ceasefire in Syria would hold and who it would depend on.

Responding to a question on how likely the Syrian Army and so-called moderate rebel groups are to observe the ceasefire negotiated by world powers, Germany’s Frank-Walter Steinmeier simply said, “51 percent.”

Sergey Lavrov, his Russian counterpart, was reluctant to voice any percentage, and said any success in the peace process would depend on the US military finally agreeing on coordinating their actions in Syria with Russia.

Read more

Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev delivers a speech at the Munich Security Conference in Munich, Germany, February 13, 2016. © Michael Dalder

He said that while his counterpart, Secretary of State John Kerry, in his Munich speech earlier said that military cooperation with Russia is what the US wants in Syria, statements from the Pentagon directly contradicted it. Moreover, the US insists on continuing its own military action in Syria while demanding that Russia put its campaign on hold, even though both campaigns are targeting terrorist groups.

“The fact that the discourse around this ceasefire is drifting toward prioritizing the halt of the operations of the Russian Air Forces makes me strongly suspect that our peace effort would end in a sour way. If the military are not maintaining an honest day-to-day contact… nothing can be achieved,” Lavrov said.

“If the Americans try to play it back now, it would be their responsibility,” he added.

Moderator Wolfgang Ischinger joked: “Sounds like a little less than 50 percent,” to which Lavrov glumly replied: “Forty-nine.”

“I don’t speak Russian, but I was judging something close to zero,” commented the third member of the panel, UK Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond.

Read more

Royal Saudi Air Force jets © Fahad Shadeed

He proceeded to say that it was Russia who can finally make or break the ceasefire, accusing Moscow of bombing the same moderate opposition that it expects to observe the ceasefire, an allegation that Russia denies.

“Whatever you call it, whatever the justification, whatever the language – over the last weeks Russia has been bombing the moderate opposition positions. In the name of fighting terrorism, whatever,” Hammond said. “Unless Russia over the next days is going to stop or at least significantly scale back that bombing, the moderate armed opposition will not join in this process.”

Ironically, Russia has been trying for months to get the sponsors of the “moderate Syrian opposition” provide the Russian military with accurate list of the armed groups, which should be considered moderate enough to be negotiated with, and their positions so that Russia wouldn’t bomb them. This information is exactly what Lavrov said the Pentagon is withholding from the Russian military, despite all Moscow’s requests.

What is collectively called the Syrian rebels are a fluid and disorganized assortment of armed groups with conflicting agendas and shifting allegiances. Agreeing who should be at the negotiations table was a major challenge during the organization of the peace talks in Munich, and eventually only the terrorist group Islamic State and the Al-Qaeda branch in Syria, the Nusra Front, were explicitly excluded.

Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , , , , , , ,

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Comment on “49%-51%: Germany, Russia, UK disagree on odds of Syrian ceasefire holding”

  1. IraB's avatar IraB Says:

    It goes without saying, but I’ll say it anyway. Syria is a cluster-f**k! The overturned applecart, in Syria, is a byproduct of the meddling by outsiders who: stirred up dormant discontent, and then pumped weapons and fighters into the region, igniting the ongoing orgy of slaughter.

    Russia, the predator, sensed an opportunity make bold moves to become the regional hegemon, Obama having effectively withdrawn US influence out of the Levant.

    Unless I am wrong, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, have contributed mightily, having long desired the removal of Bashar Assad, who stood in the way of THEIR desires to construct a pipeline through Syria, to Turkey, in order to send natural gas to be exported to Europe. Russia, on the cusp of losing it’s monopoly on gas exports to Europe, stood to be the loser, if that pipeline had gone through.

    The US, was involved, by all reports by having been sending weapons, looted from Qadaffi’s Libyan stockpiles, to the theater, through Turkey. “Connecting the dots”, it would seem that the US, in effect, must have been arming ISIS! The Obama administration’s fingerprints are all over the slaughter!

    Please enlighten me further, those who have more to add to this sordid tale.


Leave a comment