No army in Mid East is challenging ISIS. Iran regroups to defend S. Iraqi Shiites, Assad to save Damascus
No army in Mid East is challenging ISIS. Iran regroups to defend S. Iraqi Shiites, Assad to save Damascus, DEBKAfile, May 25, 2015
Iranian troops in fight to evict ISIS from Baiji refinery
Hassan Nasrallah Saturday, May 23, called his Lebanese Shiite Hizballah movement to the flag, because “we are faced with an existential crisis” from the rising belligerence of the Islamist State of Iraq and the Levant. His deputy, Sheik Naim Qssem, sounded even more desperate: “The Middle East is at the risk of partition” in a war with no end in sight, he said. “Solutions for Syria are suspended. We must now see what happens in Iraq.”
The price Iran’s Lebanese proxy has paid for fighting alongside Bashar Assad’s army for four years is cruel: some 1,000 dead and many times that number of wounded. Its leaders now understood that their sacrifice was in vain. ISIS has brought the Syrian civil war to a new dead end.
This week, a 15-year old boy was eulogized by Hizballah’s leaders for performing his “jihadist duty” in Syria.
Clearly, for their last throw in Syria, the group, having run out of adult combatants, is calling up young boys to reinforce the 7,000 fighting there.
The Syrian president Bashar Assad is in no better shape. He too has run dangerously short of fresh fighting manpower. Even his own Alawite community has let him down. Scarcely one-tenth of the 1.8 million Alawites have remained in Syria. Their birthrate is low, and those who stayed behind are hiding their young sons to keep them from being sent to the front lines.
Assad also failed to enlist the Syrian Druze minority to fight for his regime, just as Hizballah’s Nasrallah was rebuffed when he sought to mobilize the Lebanese army to their cause. This has left Hizballah and the Syrian ruler alone in the battlefield with dwindling strength against two rival foes: ISIS and the radical Syrian opposition coalition calling itself Jaish al-Fatah – the Army of Conquest – which is spearheaded by Al Qaeda’s Nusra Front and backed to topple Assad by Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey.
Nasrallah tried to paint a brave picture of full mobilization to expand the war to all parts of Syria. However, Sunday, May 24, a key adviser to Assad admitted that his regime and its allies were being forced to regroup.
Their forces were withdrawing from the effort to shift the Islamists from the land they have conquered – about three-quarters of Syrian territory – and concentrating on defending the cities, Damascus, Homs and Latakia, home to the bulk of the population, as well as the strategic Damascus highway to the coast and Beirut. Hizballah needed to build up the Lebanese border againest hostile access.
But Syrian cities, the Lebanese border and the highway are still under threat – from Syrian rebel forces.
The Iraqi army, for its part, has been virtually wiped out, along with the many billions of dollars the US spent on training and weapons. There is no longer any military force in Iraq, whether Sunni or Shiite, able to take on ISIS and loosen its grip on the central and western regions.
The Kurdish peshmerga army, to whom President Barack refused to provide armaments for combating the Islamists, has run out of steam. An new offensive would expose the two main towns of the semi-autonomous Kurdish Republic – the capital Irbil and the oil city of Kirkuk – to the depredations of the Islamist belligerents.
A quick scan of Shiite resources reveals that in the space between the Jordan River and the Euphrates and Tigris, Iran commands the only force still intact in Iraq – namely, the Iraqi, Afghan and Pakistani Shiite militias, who are trained and armed by the Revolutionary Guards.
This last remaining fighting force faces its acid test in the battle ongoing to recover Baiji, Iraq’s main oil refinery town. For the first time, Iranian troops are fighting in Iraq, not just their surrogates, but in the Baiji campaign they have made little headway in three weeks of combat. All they have managed to do is break through to the 100 Iraqi troops stranded in the town, but ISIS fighting strength is still not dislodged from the refinery.
The Obama administration can no longer pretend that the pro-Iranian Shiite militias are the panacea for the ISIS peril. Like Assad, Tehran too is being forced to regroup. It is abandoning the effort to uproot the Islamists from central and western Iraq and mustering all its Shiite military assets, such as the Badr Brigade, to defend the Shiite south – the shrine towns of Najef and Karbala, Babil (ancient Babylon) and Qadisiya – as well as planting an obstacle in the path of the Islamists to Iraq’s biggest oil fields and only port of Basra.
The Shiite militias flown in by Tehran from Pakistan and Afghanistan have demonstrated in Syria and Iraq alike that they are neither capable nor willing to jump into any battlefields.
The upshot of this cursory scan is that not a single competent army capable of launching all-out war on ISIS is to be found in the Middle East heartland – in the space between the 1,000km long Jordan and the Euphrates and Tigris to the east, or between Ramadi and the Saudi capital of Riyadh to the south.
By Sunday, May 24, this perception had seeped through to the West. US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter, remarked: “What apparently happened was that the Iraqi forces just showed no will to fight.” The former British army chief Lord Dannatt was more down to earth. Since the coalition air force campaign had failed to stop ISIS’s advance, he said “it was time to think the previously unthinkable” and send 5,000 ground troops to fight the Islamists in Syria and Iraq.
The next day, Monday, Tehran pointed the finger of blame for the latest debacles in Iraq at Washington. Al Qods Brigades chief Gen. Qassem Soleimani was quoted by the English language Revolutionary Guards mouthpiece Javan as commenting: “The US didn’t do a damn thing to stop the extremists’ advance on Ramadi.”
Explore posts in the same categories: Combat troops, Department of Defense, Iran, Iran military, Iraq, Iraq war, Iraqi military, Islamic State, Middle East, Nasrallah, Obama, Peshmerga, Syria, Syria warTags: Assad, Combat troops, Department of Defense, Iran, Iran military, Iraq, Iraq military, Iraq war, Islamic State, Middle East, Nasrallah, Obama, Peshmerga, Syria, Syria war
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
May 26, 2015 at 12:49 AM
If the U.S. and its allies were serious to stop IS then they would have done 20-50 sorties of airial bombing per day,& not 4-8per day
Why didn’t the U.S. and its allies bomb the organised columns convoys of tanks and APC, etc moving to the Jordanian border or any other places?
It seems the U.S. is pretending to help by hardly doing anything to help
Indirectly maybe it’s plan is to empower IS
US allies SHOULDNT trust the U.S. Never again anymore
US promises are worthless
I pray for Israel, I pray for our planet earth safety from IS or any organisation like them
Sakura
May 26, 2015 at 3:37 AM
During Operation Desert Storm, the US launched 1000 sorties per day. Most people here in the US will not tolerate another BS war in the Mideast. So if other nations base their trust on the US pulling the load and engaging in yet another war on everyone’s behalf, then yes, we cannot be trusted. On the other hand, if you base your trust on our ongoing military aid , logistical support, and readiness in times of dire need, then you have found your trust.
May 26, 2015 at 12:14 PM
Right on LS. I might add, to those taking shots at the U.S. WHAT ABOUT YOUR COUNRIES, who’ve been too long saving money on their own military needs. Times have changed, act accordingly!
May 26, 2015 at 12:30 PM
Sorry I’m not blaming the U.S., I have many great friends from everywhere including the U.S. , I’m blaming Obama.
If he would have kept his word in Syria about the chemical weapons
If he would have kept the American commitment to protect that Marshal Island ship
If he would have kept his commitment to the Syrian Rebels which might not have been good
But if the allies never really know if Obama is going to follow through on his commitments or change his mind in the middle of working with allies on some conflicts
Then the allies who are ready to fight might never know if they go into action with Obamas commitment whether he will let them down or betray them for any excuses
May 26, 2015 at 1:15 PM
Obama, will be gone soon and things will not change much. Over arching economic realities will prevail.
May 26, 2015 at 1:25 PM
“Then the allies who are ready to fight might never know if they go into action with Obamas commitment whether he will let them down or betray them for any excuses”
The world since WWII simply assume Uncle Sam will take care of everything. Those days are over.
“Then the allies who are ready to fight”, the allies who are ready to fight then should just fight.
May 26, 2015 at 1:37 PM
When Allies are ready to fight and they get military commitments from Obama but in the middle of military action Obama changes his mind and also will not allow the sales of weapons the allies need to finish the job on their own and run out of weapons then Obama or anyone that does that leaves their allies to crash and burn and no one will want to take suicidal risk on any military campaigns with the U.S. leadership if they gave someone like Obama
May 26, 2015 at 2:05 PM
“no one will want to take suicidal risk on any military campaigns with the U.S. leadership”
Not necessarily a bad thing!
May 26, 2015 at 2:36 PM
John , the biggest battle is fought now on USA soil ( politics , shadow government and so on ), just open your eyes .
It is the enemy within .
May 26, 2015 at 3:06 PM
Joop, me thinks that’s sounds a bit paranoid.
May 26, 2015 at 6:00 PM
I know it, but where are the missing nukes ?
May 26, 2015 at 6:46 PM
They’re in Hillary’s closet with the mail server.
May 26, 2015 at 6:59 PM
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/raymond-ibrahim/obamas-policies-to-empower-isis-exposed/
May 26, 2015 at 10:28 PM
On the Internet you can find all kinds of stuff. All I know is in 2016 the American voters will elect a new President.
Obama will buy a nice home for his family and work on his Presidential Library and play lots of golf of course.
May 27, 2015 at 2:53 PM
Don’t forget he says he will return to his beloved ‘community organizing’.
May 27, 2015 at 3:01 PM
The street corner revolutionary who prays for 2 bit hookers.
The priest in the church of alinsky , preaching the critical theory .
May 27, 2015 at 3:07 PM
I have a special love for this entity , like i love to see my morning turd flushing into the sewer system.
And my love is big after realizing how bad a plug up system is .
May 27, 2015 at 3:51 PM
Good grief…..
May 27, 2015 at 5:05 PM
Yep , that was what i,am saying after a plug up of a week.