Obama: I’m Concerned About a Loose Nuke Being Detonated in Manhattan
Obama: I’m Concerned About a Loose Nuke Being Detonated in Manhattan – The Weekly Standard.
(Oh My God. I can’t bear it any longer.
After he threatened Russia with consequences what did Putin do?
That’s right. He gave him the middle finger and went ahead.
What is the clown’s answer?
“Russia is a regional power that is threatening some of its immediate neigbors, not out of strength, but out weakness.”
I guess if someone detonates a nuke in Manhattan, it will also because that someone is weak.
What is Mr. Hope and Change doing to prevent Iran from aquiring nukes?
Yep, killing potential sanctions, killing the Tomahawk and Hellfire missile programs and hoping that Putin is a nice boy and that he does not sabotage his negtiations with Iran.
Well, clown in chief, what if Putin because of his ‘weakness’ does exactly that?
It’s unbelievable how much this guy lives in lala land.
– Artaxes)
Romney still wrong about Russia, says Obama.
11:56 AM, Mar 25, 2014 • By DANIEL HALPER
Speaking at a brief news conference in the Hague, President Obama said he’s more worried about a loose nuke being detonated in Manhattan than he is about Russia:
“With respect to Mr. Romney’s assertion that Russia is our number one geopolitical foe, the truth of the matter is that America has a whole lot of challenges,” said the president.
“Russia is a regional power that is threatening some of its immediate neigbors, not out of strength, but out weakness.
“Ukraine has been a country which Russia had enormous influence for decades, since the break-up of the Soviet Union, and we have considerable influence on our neighbors, we generally don’t need to invade them in order to have a strong cooperative relationship with them. The fact that Russia felt compelled to go in militarily and laid bear these violations of internationl law indicates less influence not more.
“So my response then continues to be what I believe today, which is: Russia’s actions are a problem. They don’t pose the number one national security threat to the United States. I continue to be much more concerned when it comes to our security with the prospect of a nuclear weapon going off in Manhattan,” said Obama.
Daniel Halper is online editor of The Weekly Standard and author of the forthcoming book Clinton, Inc.: The Audacious Rebuilding of a Political Machine.
Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized
WarSclerotic 
March 25, 2014 at 11:02 PM
There is not much coming from the present US president that could surprise me anymore – but what perplexes me is the unbelievable passivity of the US citizens…..I really think that in most other western nations a person like the present US president would have been forced out of office quite a while ago…the people would have risen against him ! Personally I think that the average US citizen has been forced by the authorities / the economy into a lifestyle of passivity on purpose – as Michael Moore said : you keep the people in a state of constant crisis / troubles and dependency, this way you will be able to manipulate them !
I see as the goal of the present US president the destruction of the USA / the entire western society and to install a totalitarian tyranny !
I think that he is very successfull so far and I cant see substantial efforts to stop him !
I hope that the true americans gonna recapture their once great nation quickly – otherwise it might be too late !
March 25, 2014 at 11:19 PM
If, as most people subconsciously presume any American president to be, Obama is an American president just trying to look out for the best interests of America, then he’s a great failure.
If, on the other hand, like Colonel House in the Woodrow Wilson administration or Harry Dexter White in the Franklin Roosevelt administration, Obama is an enemy agent who has infiltrated the American political system and risen to a very high level, where he can do enormous damage, then he is very successful.
Given the obvious chip on his shoulder that Obama has towards white America, and the books he’s written, and the people he’s associated with throughout his life, and the subversive actions he’s taken towards America and it’s allies, I say “enemy agent”, successful enemy agent.
If you disagree, then tell me, how would Obama’s actions be any different if he were an enemy agent? He’s doing everything he thinks he can get away with without getting caught, without being so obvious that he get’s impeached, without bringing an early end to his nation wrecking.
March 25, 2014 at 11:41 PM
In my opinion, Obama’s biggest fear regarding a nuclear detonation in Manhattan is being forced to retaliate.
March 26, 2014 at 12:36 AM
A tight nuke over DC is cool though, Mr. President?
March 26, 2014 at 2:10 AM
Artaxes may i use your comment at top of this topic on an other site ?
March 26, 2014 at 11:13 AM
If you are quoting my name I trust you that you are using it in the correct context.
If you don’t quote my name, use it as you want.
Go ahead, Joop.
March 27, 2014 at 12:45 AM
Thanks !
March 26, 2014 at 1:50 PM
“Russia is a regional power that is threatening some of its immediate neigbors, not out of strength, but out weakness.” Quite true, Obama’s weakness
March 26, 2014 at 10:25 PM
I guess a nuke in Manhattan, thats not what Mr BHO fears, but what he is hoping for ! ( as a man who hates whites, capitalism, western civilization, judeo christian societies, democracy, Israel…)