Iran, world powers reach historic nuclear deal with Iran – The Washington Post
Iran, world powers reach historic nuclear deal with Iran – The Washington Post.
By Anne Gearan and Joby Warrick,
GENEVA — Iran and six major powers agreed early Sunday on a historic deal that freezes key parts of Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for temporary relief on some economic sanctions, diplomats confirmed.
The deal was reached after four days of marathon bargaining and an eleventh-hour intervention by Secretary of State John F. Kerry and foreign ministers from Europe, Russia and China, the sources said.
The agreement, sealed at a 3 a.m. signing ceremony in Geneva’s Palace of Nations, requires Iran to halt or scale back parts of its nuclear infrastructure, the first such pause in more than a decade.
“We have reached an agreement,” Michael Mann, spokesman for European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, said in a Twitter posting that was echoed by a separate posting by Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif.
The deal, intended as a first step toward a more comprehensive nuclear pact to be completed in six months, freezes or reverses progress at all of Iran’s major nuclear facilities, according to Western officials familiar with the details. It halts the installation of new centrifuges used to enrich uranium and caps the amount and type of enriched uranium that Iran is allowed to produce.
Iran also agreed to halt work on key components of a heavy-water reactor that could someday provide Iran with a source of plutonium. In addition, Iran accepted a dramatic increase in oversight, including daily monitoring by international nuclear inspectors, the officials said.
The concessions not only halt Iran’s nuclear advances but also make it virtually impossible for Tehran to build a nuclear weapon without being detected, the officials said. In return, Iran will receive modest relief of trade sanctions and access to some of its frozen currency accounts overseas, concessions said to be valued at less than $7 billion over the six-month term of the deal. The sanctions would be reinstated if Iran violates the agreement’s terms.
Speaking at the White House after the deal with announced, President Obama praised the negotiators. “We have pursued intensive diplomacy,” he said. “Today that diplomacy opened up a new path toward a world that’s more secure.” he said.
“For the first time in nearly a decade we have halted parts of Iran’s nuclear program.”
The agreement is a long-sought victory for the Obama administration, which from its earliest days made the Iranian nuclear program one of its top foreign policy priorities. The administration, helped by its overseas allies as well as Congress, achieved unprecedented success in imposing harsh economic sanctions that cut Iran’s oil exports in half and decimated the country’s currency. It was hoping to quickly finalize an agreement in the face of threats by Congress to impose additional economic sanctions on Iran.
The deal is also a victory for Kerry, who traveled to Geneva twice in two weeks to participate in the negotiations.
Still, the agreement is likely to face heavy opposition from key allies — chiefly Israel and Saudi Arabia — as well as congressional skeptics who have demanded much greater concessions from Iran, including the dismantling of its enrichment program.
In a posting on Twitter, Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), outspoken on foreign and military affairs, expressed his concerns about a deal, saying, “Unless the agreement requires dismantling of the Iranian centrifuges, we really haven’t gained anything..”
Moments later, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) suggested the diplomatic agreement was designed to distract from domestic troubles for President Obama: “Amazing what WH will do to distract attention from O-care.”
The marathon discussions with Iran were described by Western diplomats as “very difficult” and “intense,” and several officials had sought to lower expectations that a resolution could be reached before Sunday, when Kerry and the other foreign ministers were due to depart. Negotiations over the deal had remained snarled late into Saturday evening, with the foreign ministers of Britain, France, Germany, China, Russia, the European Union and the United States huddled in a hotel conference room.
Several of the diplomats met earlier in the day with Iran’s Zarif, who told reporters that the parties remained divided on key details of the six-month deal.
Kerry, Zarif and Ashton met late Saturday, but the session ended with no announcement of progress. Instead, Iran’s deputy foreign minister hardened his position on what he called Iran’s right to enrich uranium, a matter of deep national pride.
Although “98 percent” of the deal was done, Iran said it could not accept any agreement that does not recognize enrichment rights, Abbas Araghchi told reporters.
“Any agreement without recognizing Iran’s right to enrich, practically and verbally, will be unacceptable for Tehran,” Araghchi said, according to Reuters.
Western officials have balked at recognizing a legal right to uranium enrichment, hoping instead to craft language that acknowledges the right of all countries to pursue nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Zarif appeared to endorse that approach publicly this month.
The sides also continued to haggle over details of the limited sanctions relief to be offered in return for Iran’s scaling back its nuclear program, diplomats said.
The most painful sanctions, affecting Iran’s oil and banking sectors, would remain until the end of the deal’s first phase, and any relaxation of them was dependent on Iran’s willingness to accept permanent curbs on its nuclear program, Western officials said.
Still another obstacle was Iran’s partially completed heavy-water reactor in the city of Arak. The agreement freezes construction of the reactor’s core, which could, if completed, give Iran a path toward obtaining plutonium for nuclear weapons.
Kerry decided to intervene in the talks after negotiators reportedly made progress in overcoming key obstacles to a deal. Kerry joined Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who arrived in Geneva on Friday, as well as British and French counterparts who traveled to Switzerland early Saturday. Diplomats and technical teams from Iran and the six major powers had been meeting privately since Wednesday to resolve a number of sticking points.
Israel, a close U.S. ally, opposes the deal as too generous to an enemy it sees as a mortal threat. Israel is not a party to the talks.
The Obama administration has been unable to reassure Israel or another partner, Saudi Arabia, that the arrangement would make the Middle East safer.
Talks were meant to end Friday. But they were extended as foreign ministers joined lower-level negotiators Saturday for what appeared to be final rounds of talks.
A spokeswoman for Kerry had said he would leave Sunday for other diplomatic meetings. Because Kerry is considered an essential player in finalizing the pact, that set an unofficial deadline to either strike a deal or announce that this round came close, but not close enough.
Zarif and Iranian President Hassan Rouhani have pushed for a deal in the past three months, an about-face after years of unproductive talks. These negotiations were the first extended talks between senior U.S. and Iranian diplomats in more than 30 years.
© The Washington Post Company
Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized
November 24, 2013 at 7:05 AM
Looking forward to reading the details. Gut feeling that Iran just won more time to keep talking. They have been good at that for a long time.
November 24, 2013 at 7:15 AM
Naftali Bennett said Saturday night that a bad deal would make a strike MORE likely.
The diplomats “victory” may be very short lived.
Unless I hear Israeli officials do a public 180 and state their approval of the deal, I’m going to continue to believe that Israeli military action is imminent.
Fasten your seatbelts……………….
November 24, 2013 at 7:16 AM
details is against iran,but iran easily won much more time to enrich and is showing itself a winner inside iran.escaped from imminent economic collapse.just watch tehran stock index.
November 24, 2013 at 7:30 AM
3 hours now and no public comments from Israel or Gulf states who were against the “bad deal”.
Also Obama’s public comments that Israel and Gulf states are “skeptical” leads me to believe nothing has changed as far as they are concerned.
November 24, 2013 at 10:06 AM
True, the situation seems pretty grim, one the one hand.
On the other hand, I’m looking at this puzzle of events and trying to figure out how the pieces might fit together, and you know, I seem to see a pattern forming that looks something like – Any plan/government/organisation which present WH administration has put their support behind…… you know like Morsi and the MB; the FSA; Obamacare; the Lybian people; need I continue?? None of them seem to be doing so well today? So maybe all this attention that the Iranian government is getting from the WH is not so bad for Israel after all………?