US’s biggest pro-Israel groups back Obama on Syria action
Israel Hayom | US’s biggest pro-Israel groups back Obama on Syria action.
Groups issue their most public show of support for U.S. action since Aug. 21 chemical attack in Syria • Meanwhile, Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) says: “The Israelis will always take care of themselves. They have never asked for our military.”
|
U.S. President Barack Obama at an AIPAC convention in 2011
|
Photo credit: AP
|
Three influential pro-Israel groups urged U.S. lawmakers on Tuesday to authorize President Barack Obama to launch an attack on Syria, signaling a stepped-up lobbying effort for American military action.
The statements by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the Anti-Defamation League and the Republican Jewish Coalition represented the three organizations’ most public show of support for U.S. military action since the Aug. 21 attack near Damascus, in which Syria’s government is accused of having used chemical weapons to kill more than 1,400 people.
During the past two weeks, the organizations were unusually quiet as the Obama administration sought to build a case for limited strikes against Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government.
Supporters of the organizations and government sources acknowledged that the groups had made it known that they supported U.S. action. But, the sources said, the organizations generally wanted the debate to focus on U.S. national security, rather than how a decision to attack Syria might help Israel — a reflection of their sensitivity about not being seen as rooting for the U.S. to go to war.
Even so, in recent days, Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry and other administration officials emphasized that a mission to degrade Assad’s chemical weapons stockpiles would reduce his ability to use them in Syria’s civil war and beyond the county’s borders.
They also argued that if the U.S. took a stand against chemical weapons in Syria, this would be a warning to Iran, the Hezbollah terrorist group and others that might threaten the Jewish state.
Failing to act, the administration has argued, would endanger Israel by allowing instability on its borders and emboldening Iran.
It was unclear precisely why the pro-Israel groups issued their statements on Tuesday. But the statements followed a 45-minute meeting at the White House in which administration officials briefed Jewish groups on how it was framing the debate on Capitol Hill, according to a government source who was not authorized to speak publicly.
In a statement, AIPAC called on Congress to “support the president’s effort to protect American security interests” and “dissuade the Syrian regime’s further use of unconventional weapons.”
“The civilized world cannot tolerate the use of these barbaric weapons, particularly against an innocent civilian population including hundreds of children,” the statement said. It was signed by AIPAC President Michael Kassen and chief executive Howard Kohr.
“America must also send a forceful message of resolve to Iran and Hezbollah — both of whom have provided direct and extensive military support to Assad,” AIPAC said.
Israel and groups that support it are particularly sensitive to the use of chemical weapons in light of Nazi use of deadly gas during World War II. Nearly half of the estimated six million Jews killed during the war are widely believed to have been gassed at Nazi prison camps.
In the ADL’s statement, National Chairman Barry Curtiss-Lusher and National Director Abraham Foxman said that “any nation that violates international norms and obligations which threaten the peace and security of the world must face the consequences of those dangerous acts.”
And in a statement posted on its website, the Republican Jewish Coalition said, “It is imperative that the U.S. preserve its ability to protect a credible military deterrent.”
The cautious approach taken by the pro-Israel groups in the days after the Aug. 21 chemical attack in Syria was similar to that of Israel itself.
Since the rebellion against Assad began in 2011, Israel has not injected itself into Syria’s civil war, a sign that however wary of Assad, Israeli officials are also concerned about potential chaos between warring factions in Syria should Assad be ousted.
On Tuesday, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon sought to distance Israel from any U.S. decision making.
“We are not involved nor are we getting involved in Syria,” he said. “We reiterate this again and again.”
Several U.S. lawmakers said they had not heard from Israel on the matter of Syria.
“The Israelis will always take care of themselves. They have never asked for our military. They will never ask for anyone to defend them but themselves, and I think that Israel will be just fine,” said Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

September 4, 2013 at 5:18 PM
“McCain opposes Syria strike resolution”
The Hawks will push for a tougher resolution wich the rank and file will not support!
September 4, 2013 at 5:21 PM
“McCain opposes Syria strike resolution”
The Hawks will push for a tougher resolution which the rank and file will not support!
AP
“Sen. McCain, the president’s strongest ally for a strike in Syria, deals administration a setback by opposing a Senate proposal for use of force, as he pushes for a more aggressive plan.”
Tougher resolution = Death knell, DOA with American public!!!!!