After reported gas attack, Israeli leaders call for action on Syria
After reported gas attack, Israeli leaders call for action on Syria | The Times of Israel.
Situation can’t continue, PM says, hinting that Israel could make move, while president calls for international effort to remove chemical weapons
The situation in Syria can’t be allowed to continue, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday, while President Shimon Peres said the price of letting Damascus hold onto chemical weapons was greater than that of an operation to remove them and other top ministers urged action as well.
The statements came as Washington and other Western countries are weighing how to respond to reports that the regime in Damascus fired chemical warheads last week, killing hundreds.
Netanyahu added that Israel “will always know how to protect our citizens” should Syrian weapons be turned on the Jewish state.
“Our hand is always on the pulse,” said. “Our finger is a responsible one and if needed, is on the trigger. We will always know how to protect our citizens and our country against those who come to injure us or try to attack us.”
Speaking ahead of the weekly cabinet meeting, Netanyahu said that reports of the mass chemical weapons attack outside Damascus point to “a terrible tragedy and a terrible crime. Our hearts go out to the women, children, babies and civilians injured so cruelly by the use of weapons of mass destruction.”
Israel, like the rest of the world, has refrained from responding to the Syrian civil war in any large-scale way, taking in only a small number of injured Syrians and reportedly carrying out covert air strikes at regime weapons sites. Yet officials have said action must be taken, with most expecting Washington to respond to the attack.
On Sunday Peres called for a concentrated international effort to “take out” Syrian’s chemical weapons.
The “moral call is superior to any strategic considerations,” the president said, so therefore “the time has come for a joint effort to remove all the chemical weapons from Syria. They cannot remain there either in the hands of Assad or of others.”
The prime minister, counting off Israel’s takeaways from the attack, hinted that what happened in Syria could be signal to Israel for how to deal with other conflicts.
“One, the situation can’t continue. Two, the most dangerous regimes in the world can’t possess the most dangerous weapons in the world. Three, of course we expect the situation to stop, but we remember the ancient principle of the sages, ‘If we are not for ourselves, who is for us?’”
Netanyahu will meet later in the day with French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, with Syria expected to be on the agenda for discussion.
Peres, after meeting with Fabius in Jerusalem, called Syrian President Bashar Assad “a ruler who kills his people with the most terrible means and without any consideration… we cannot remain indifferent.”
Although removing chemical weapons would be “very complicated” and “very expensive,” Peres said, “it is more dangerous and more expensive to leave [them] there. It must be done.”
Earlier in the day, Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz told Army Radio the attack requires a response. He said the chances that Syria would attack Israel as a result of US action were slim but that the army should be prepared for such an eventuality.
Justice Minister Tzipi Livni told Israel Radio that a US response to the alleged poison gas attack would help discourage future chemical weapons use, but also have security implications for Israel.
Neither Netanyahu nor the ministers specified what type of response they were urging.
The Associated Press contributed to this report
Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized
August 25, 2013 at 1:32 PM
The reactions of the Israeli security and political establishment don’t leave any doubt regarding what should be the Israeli militarily approach to this situation. Feeling the Israeli soul is an advantage saved only for those who live here and are listening to the deep heart ticks of the people here.
Israel couldn’t remained anymore quiet in the presence of the Syrian war atrocities, committed this time while using war gas on a large scale. ”Others” – even important ones – can speak and draw lines or withdrawing behind those lines , all is ok, is not our business to say to ”others” what to do or shouldn’t do in this grave issue.
But when the events are clashing with our very own base of existence, when WMD are been used very close to our borders and those in charge can go unpunished, Israel is ready to act for defending itself from ”dangerous regimes with dangerous weapons” and to carrying the torch of hope for other people in our region, for there are brave men and women in Zion, and our hearts are beating strong for our country.
August 25, 2013 at 4:54 PM
Luis you’re a great writer and you write great things,
and I for one truly dislike playing devil’s advocate,
but in this open forum, I can’t help but think out loud a couple of questions which come to mind in reaction to you’rs and similar voices regarding what should be our level of reaction/involvement to this chemical attack:
Would it be that relative peace and stability reigned within Syria, and a similar or worse CW weapons attack was God forbid executed against the ‘enemy Zionist regime’ – do you think those people in Syria would give two hoots? Can you guarantee that they wouldn’t be baking cakes and celebrating if those pictures of people in body bags were of Jews?
And do you really think that any Israeli military intervention in Syria is going to be properly appreciated by anyone in the Arab world?
I don’t pretend to have any definite answers to those questions, but I do feel they need to be asked, and I tend to lean towards concluding that, not nice as it may sound, we need to protect our own interests in the best way we know how, and the interests of those who have proven to be our allies……
August 25, 2013 at 5:19 PM
Me thinks at this time Israel should stand aside but stand ready.
August 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM
One ORBAT I read awhile ago postulated if Israel is hit with CW, 4-5 precise neutron strikes would happen around the Syrian C&C structures in control of the CW, which would take care of personnel in bunkers, etc. but leave the weapons intact for quick’n’dirty commando raids (from what country I have no idea… 🙂 to destroy them. I’m quite sure there are many other less frightening plans…but that would do it.