Iran’s nuclear bomb program complete

Iran’s nuclear bomb program complete.

Source reveals secret site; last obstacle is to arm missiles

Published: 11 hours ago

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/irans-nuclear-bomb-program-complete/#6UqQJS5fyqhd6t2R.99

Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

22 Comments on “Iran’s nuclear bomb program complete”

    • Justice for israel's avatar Justice for israel Says:

      ITs time to nuke iran its the end of the road,that explains russias fleet,its all a huge miscalculation America ay well not help but NATO sees it all in a different light,and there is real scorn on obama there,Britain and France feel betrayed by America

  1. Luis's avatar Luis Says:

    If this is true and the America of Obama will enter its winter hibernation sleep, then there is not much left to speculations here and they who must act will act. Let be no doubt here about the facts; 2013 is not 2012 and nobody will do the work in Iran for Israel. The Iran Express is in the station and its waiting.

  2. Louisiana Steve's avatar Louisiana Steve Says:

    So now, I guess, the red line is how far the Iranians will be pushed before they retaliate with nukes.

  3. Norm's avatar Norm Says:

    I suppose we all understood that Obama was not telling us the truth when he declared the Iran would never get nuclear weapons. His words and his deeds are most often not the same. With an Obama, Kerry & Hagel lineup the bottom line is this:

    In the next war America will NOT resupply Israeli forces. No jet fuel, no bombs, nothing. Plan accordingly.

    American Jewish elected officials like Senator Schumer are all Nebbishes. Remember that , they are nebbishes.

    • Luis's avatar Luis Says:

      America may not resupply Israel if a war breaks out only if can be demonstrated that Israel was the aggressor. Let all here be kind and let us explain a couple of simple, but crucial things.

      The year is 1973, that faithful Yom Kippur october and the egyptian army was concentrated along the Suez Canal in some critical points, for a decisive break out through the israeli strong holds, along the Suez, The Bar Lev Line. All the israeli important state people knew what they were suppose to knew and still, no preemptive ’67 strike style was deployed against the egyptian menace. And why was that ? Because Kissinger made clear to Golda Meir – the israeli PM in that period – that if Israel will strike first, no logistic assistance will be accorded. So Israel waited and was on the edge before the IDF finally succeeded to isolate the 3rd egyptian army and winning the war. But, a heavy price was payed.
      Today, the strategical situation is similar, the international players are in the same positions of demand, and it may seems to us that Israel is again in a difficult position. But this is not true, because an attack on Iran can be deployed without any israeli planes attacking openly in the iranian mountains. So if Iran will go mad because of any mysterious reason and will decide to attack Israel, then the american assistance will be asked and it will be given.

      • Louisiana Steve's avatar Louisiana Steve Says:

        In other words, Israel must suffer a ‘politically correct’ death toll before they are ‘allowed’ to pre-empt or retailiate.

      • Justice for israel's avatar Justice for israel Says:

        Other NATO country’s will resupply Israel and will come to Israels aid,you can count on that

  4. Luis's avatar Luis Says:

    Yes, Steve got that right. Israel must sacrifice first ”something” for being able to properly react later. For example, Israel didn’t react at the first missile salvos from Gaza until it was clear that it cannot stand that anymore. If we are to attack first, that will be bad for jews and we are saying that very serious. And why is that ? Because of the special and unique position that the people of Israel – the chosen people – has in the world. We already debate this in another previous comment, so we don’t abuse now of the readers patience.


  5. We might need to contend with Obama for a while yet:

    A United States congressman has introduced a bill that would repeal the 22nd Amendment, which currently limits the president to serving only two terms as commander-in-chief. Should the bill become a law, it could allow President Barack Obama to run for reelection yet again in 2016.


  6. Obama’s New CIA Director: “Jihad is Holy Struggle, a Legitimate Tenet of Islam”

    Obama Gives Hezbollah 200 Armored Personnel Carriers

    http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obama-gives-hezbollah-200-armored-personnel-carriers/

  7. Joseph Wouk's avatar josephwouk Says:

    Justice…

    I trashed your last comment for your own protection. I hope you understand.

    I’ve read of less causing the jack-boots to show up at your house.

    Be careful, my friend…

  8. artaxes's avatar artaxes Says:

    Whether this article is true or not, I think 2013 will be the year of decision.
    There is still the possibility, that they don’t have a nuke yet, in which case a massive campaign of sabotage might delay the inevitable a little further but I don’t think they could delay it that much.
    On the other hand Israel would be foolish, if it waits until the last moment, literally shortly before they assemble the bomb.
    The risk of failure when trying to stop Iran at that moment would be too high.
    The implicit assumption here is that the timeframes layed out by Netanyahu (and the IAEA) are correct and that.Israel is serious about stopping Iran.

  9. Mark's avatar Mark Says:

    I am so sick of Netanyahu talking rather than acting. We all know the longer the Israelis wait the worse the inevitable war will be.

    Right now it seems Israel will wait at least until Spring before taking action. Hopefully Netanyahu’s deadline at the UN last September meant something and wasn’t just another stalling tactic to justify inaction.

  10. Kishonist's avatar Kishonist Says:

    Not many people here seem to know that Obama has been a puppet of Brzezinski for decades, and that Brzezinski is a core member of the Council on Foreign Relations, where long-term decisions are made concerning the strategic orientations of U.S. capitalism.
    Clearly, they want to get rid of the current ayatollahs and get new people in power there : radical Muslim oligarchs who want an alliance with the USA, and agree to order imams in and around Russia and China to do their best to weaken Russia and China. The crucial question is : did the antisemitic Brzezinski convince the Council on Foreign Relations to sacrifice Israel ? One atomic bomb exploding in Israel is enough to destroy Israel.


    • So what your saying is that the Council on Foreign Relations wants to use the president and the US military as its puppets to force a regime change in Iran and repleace it was a more dangerous but pro-US system?

      Would you also agree that the ‘Great Game’ being played out against Russia since 1815 is at the center of whats happening around the world?

      • Justice for israel's avatar Justice for israel Says:

        AT last its starting to sink in,but i sadly say obama is a communist,and not on the side of the west

  11. renbe's avatar renbe Says:

    “The source, who has access to Iran’s nuclear program, said the Islamic regime is working out of seven nuclear sites, most unknown to the IAEA, and that its nuclear bomb program is complete.”

    Which makes one wonder why the “source” doesn’t tell where these nuclear sites are located, so that the IAEA can have a look…

    • Kishonist's avatar Kishonist Says:

      You are quite right.
      The answer is : one part of the U.S. oligarchy wants to destroy Iran’s nuclear installations, another part just wants to turn Iran into an ally, and maybe preferably with its nuclear installations intact.


Leave a comment