Morsi in 2010: No peace with descendants of apes and pigs
Morsi in 2010: No peace with descendants o… JPost – Middle East.
( Oogah boogah! Oink! – JW )
Photo: REUTERS
Israeli-Palestinian negotiations are “a waste of time and opportunities” as Arabs and Muslims get nothing out of engagement with “the descendants of apes and pigs,” current Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi asserted in September 2010, according to newly translated interviews published by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) this week.In the first interview, aired on Lebanon’s Al-Quds TV on September 23, 2010, Morsi denounced the Palestinian Authority as a creation of “the Zionist and American enemies for the sole purpose of opposing the will of the Palestinian people.” Therefore, he stressed, “No reasonable person can expect any progress on this track.”
“Either [you accept] the Zionists and everything they want, or else it is war,” Morsi said, “This is what these occupiers of the land of Palestine know – these blood-suckers, who attack the Palestinians, these warmongers, the descendants of apes and pigs.”
In the result, according to MEMRI, Morsi called on Arabs and Muslims worldwide to “employ all forms of resistance against…those criminal Zionists, who attack Palestine and the Palestinians.”
“Pressure should be exerted upon them,” Morsi continued, so that Jews should “not be given any opportunity [to] stand on any Arab or Islamic land.”
In a separate interview translated by MEMRI, aired on the same network on March 20, 2010, Morsi affirmed that “The Zionists have no right to the land of Palestine…. What they took before 1947-8 constitutes plundering, and what they are doing now is a continuation of this plundering. By no means do we recognize their Green Line. The land of Palestine belongs to the Palestinians, not to the Zionists.”
He therefore called on the Islamic world “to confront this Zionist entity” and to severe “all ties of all kinds…with this plundering criminal entity,” including a total boycott of Israel and the avoidance of “normalization of relations with it.”
Morsi concluded that the Arab-Islamic world “want[s] a country for the Palestinians on the entire land of Palestine…[and] all the talk about a two-state solution and about peace is nothing but an illusion.”
The Jews, he said, “have been fanning the flames of civil strife wherever they were throughout history. They are hostile by nature…. The Zionists understood nothing but the language of force.”
WarSclerotic 
January 4, 2013 at 6:25 PM
He can wear suits and ties all he wants. He looks like a swine and as soon as he opens his mouth he proves beyond any reasonable doubt that he is a swine.
This is the face of “moderate islam”, in selected countries near you, brought to you by …
As the other swine Erdogan once said: “There is no moderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s that”.
That swine also famously compared democracy to a streetcar saying “You ride it until you arrive at your destination, then you step off.”.
These two quotes are really all you need to know about this so-called moderate islam.
This idea of “ape and pigs” comes directly from his childmolesting “prophet”.
January 4, 2013 at 7:25 PM
I feel sorry for the great people of Egypt that their president is a semidoct ( uneducated ) man. And why is he like that ? Well, Ishmael was the brother of Yitzhak and both were the sons of Avraham Avinu ( Avraham, Our Father ). So, Avraham was the father of both the jews ( by Yitzhak ) and the arabs ( by Ishmael ).
Even the Koran doesn’t dispute that. But now we have a problem and we are very worried of what might happen to our beloved Morsi in his own country, by the hands of the faithful. Because Morsi is telling us that the father of the arab nation – Umma – is, in fact , a monkey that married a pig. So, Morsi, be careful when you are playing the Darwin of the muslim world. Don’t punch the jews, because you are punching yourself.
January 6, 2013 at 7:52 PM
MEMRI is well known for its creative translations…
January 7, 2013 at 11:51 AM
Yes, Ahmad also was ”bad” translated when he wished to terminate the ”zionist state”.
January 7, 2013 at 12:57 PM
Indeed he was, also by MEMRI, google it:
“Ahmadinejad did not say he was going to ‘wipe Israel off the map’ because no such idiom exists in Persian.” Instead, “he did say he hoped its regime, i.e., a Jewish-Zionist state occupying Jerusalem, would collapse.” The pro-Israel Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) translated the phrase similarly, as “this regime” must be “eliminated from the pages of history.”
So, my friend, at last we agree on something.
January 7, 2013 at 3:49 PM
renbe, I’m shure, he really just meant to send a message of love and peace.
It is funny how he and his boss are such lousy communicators.
They are chronically mistranslated even by their own people.
Even on the official website of the regime, we could read that Khamenei called Israel a tumerous cancer and last Feb. he said, that this cancer will be removed.
Don’t insult our intelligence.
January 7, 2013 at 5:36 PM
Folks, I’ve just about “had it” with renbe.
Because he avoided the hate-filled invective of others who have taken the opposing side of the Iran/Israel conflict, I wanted him to continue posting so that we could get a feeling for how the “other half” thinks, so to speak.
As of late, his comments have degenerated into simple minded negativity about any and all criticism of Iran.
Others here have maintained that he is not even a person but rather a number of people posting under the same moniker. Once that was pointed out, I noticed that indeed the quality and style of his posts varies widely.
If he (they?) wish to post here, they had better improve the quality of their remarks or be spammed off the forum. Otherwise, we gain nothing from forbearing our annoyance and revulsion.
I’d like some feedback from the main posters on the site. (You know who you are.)
January 8, 2013 at 8:09 AM
Very sharp observation regarding the changing in style comments for the name ”renbe”; indeed, not all the time it appears to be the same form of the phrases; sometimes we could read something very different in style, form and faults. But we are not sure 100 pro cents; what we are are trying to say is that is very interesting that more people payed attention to the same issue.