Satellite imagery shows Iran may be ‘washing’ military site
Satellite imagery shows Iran may… JPost – Iranian Threat – News.
VIENNA – A US security institute says commercial satellite imagery shows new activity at an Iranian military site which raises concern that the Islamic state may be “washing” a building the United Nations’ nuclear agency wants to inspect.
The United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) suspects nuclear weapons-related research may have taken place at the Parchin military complex southeast of Tehran.
Iran has dismissed the allegations but has yet to allow the agency to visit the facility, despite repeated requests.
IAEA chief Yukiya Amano said last week that the agency had recently noticed some “activities” there. He gave no details but Western diplomats suspect Iran may be cleaning the site before any inspection. Tehran denies this.
The Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), a Washington-based think-tank specializing on nuclear proliferation, said it had acquired commercial satellite imagery from April 9 which back up the IAEA’s concern.
“The new activity seen in the satellite image occurred outside a building suspected to contain an explosive chamber used to carry out nuclear weapons related experiments,” it said on its website in a May 8 report including the satellite image.
Iran’s mission to the IAEA was not immediately available for comment. It has previously dismissed allegations aired about Parchin as “childish” and “ridiculous”.
The images showed items lined up outside a building and what appeared to be a stream of water, ISIS said.
“The items visible outside the building could be associated with the removal of equipment from the building or with cleansing it,” it said.
US sees Iranian obstruction
“The stream of water that appears to emanate from the building raises concerns that Iran may have been washing inside the building, or perhaps washing the items outside the building,” ISIS said.
Previous satellite images from recent months did not show any similar activity at the building, indicating it is not a regular occurrence, it added.
The IAEA has said that gaining access to Parchin is a priority when it holds a new round of talks with Iran in Vienna next week after two previous meetings in Tehran failed to make any notable progress.
Western powers suspect Iran is seeking to develop the capability to make nuclear bombs. Iran, one of the world’s largest oil producers, says its program is peaceful.
An IAEA report late last year revealed a trove of intelligence pointing to research activities in Iran of use in developing the means and technologies needed to assemble nuclear weapons, should it decide to do so.
One finding in the report was information that Iran had built a large containment chamber at Parchin in which to conduct high-explosives tests that the IAEA said are “strong indicators of possible weapon development”.
A senior US official said on Tuesday that Iran must cooperate with the IAEA’s investigation and provide access to relevant sites, personnel and documents.
“Iran continues to delay and obstruct that process,” Thomas Countryman, assistant secretary for international security and nonproliferation, told a meeting in Vienna.
May 9, 2012 at 2:53 PM
I have always wondered something:
If a nuclear explosion happens inside, let’s say, Parchin, how the world will know if it was a tactical nuke from a “western power” or a experiment that went badly wrong?
I.
May 9, 2012 at 4:05 PM
That is a very good point, sir. The Israelis dont have to paint The Star Of David on the Little Boy which will blow up Qom, neither paint the israeli flag on their strike planes – if any.
May 11, 2012 at 10:50 AM
Isaac, I’m with you up to a point, but are you suggesting causing a nuclear explosion at ground level?
When Iran leaves Vienna next week, the IAEA should have an agreement that inspectors are at Parchin and Fordo before the Baghdad meeting and if this fails to materialise in paper and in practice, then Iran can have no credibility or leverage on 23rd when the talks will once again implode, necessitating the usage of other items on the table.
May 14, 2012 at 3:08 PM
Yes, i’m just trying to think of “what if” scenarios